[thoughtomator]

This is a case study in the futility of nonviolence and appeasement in the face of totalitarianism. Nonviolence is only an effective tactic where the will of the people matters.

[CarrotAndStick]

This is a case study in the futility of nonviolence and appeasement in the face of totalitarianism. Nonviolence is only an effective tactic where the will of the people matters.

Yes, but don't forget that post-WW2, the British were severely weakened to keep hold of their 'Jewel in the Crown' for any longer. Besides, almost 2 million Indians had served in WW2, and they would start demanding independence.

[D-fendr]

Tibet did not practice non-violence when attacked by China. The were outgunned and outmanned. It wasn't much of a fight.

[Gava]

If one's opposition is attempting to bring about the destruction of life and sees the destruction of life as an end in itself than one should prepare for war and violence while presenting himself as a peaceful wall of defense.