Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freepatriot32

Background checks aren't going to be allowed to disclose what kind of anti-depressants a dating site participant has been prescribed, so the whole thing remains a big gamble. There is no way to legislate the risk out of an inherently risky activity.


5 posted on 03/29/2005 5:28:34 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Jeeves

Sure there is. Require men to be given injections of estrogen until they're married. That'd probably do the trick.

Of course, then we'd end up acting like a bunch of French pusses...but that's the ultimate objective of these POS nanny-state legislators anyway.


8 posted on 03/29/2005 5:30:58 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Not just anti-depressants. I would also be looking at serial divorces, serial restraining orders (either directions), membership in radical organizations, etc. BTW, what I have listed are of course disqualifying criteria. After one very bad experience (she went extreme psycho), I would almost prefer running a background check of the same magnitude of a Q clearance.


33 posted on 03/29/2005 9:54:26 AM PST by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson