"Sustenance and hydration" are classified as medical treatments, according to Florida law.
Hint: the law is wrong. Food and water are not medicine. I agree with the pope on this. In an extraordinary circumstance, they may be withheld, if they are doing more harm than good. The nutritional maintenance of an otherwise healthy disabled woman in MCS or PVS is not such a circumstance.
So what?!? Lex mulla, lex nulla.
The sick person in a vegetative state, awaiting recovery or a natural end, still has the right to basic health care (nutrition, hydration, cleanliness, warmth, etc.), and to the prevention of complications related to his confinement to bed. He also has the right to appropriate rehabilitative care and to be monitored for clinical signs of eventual recovery.
I should like particularly to underline how the administration of water and food, even when provided by artificial means, always represents a natural means of preserving life, not a medical act. Its use, furthermore, should be considered, in principle, ordinary and proportionate, and as such morally obligatory, insofar as and until it is seen to have attained its proper finality, which in the present case consists in providing nourishment to the patient and alleviation of his suffering.
The obligation to provide the "normal care due to the sick in such cases" (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Iura et Bona, p. IV) includes, in fact, the use of nutrition and hydration (cf. Pontifical Council "Cor Unum", Dans le Cadre, 2, 4, 4; Pontifical Council for Pastoral Assistance to Health Care Workers, Charter of Health Care Workers, n. 120). The evaluation of probabilities, founded on waning hopes for recovery when the vegetative state is prolonged beyond a year, cannot ethically justify the cessation or interruption of minimal care for the patient, including nutrition and hydration. Death by starvation or dehydration is, in fact, the only possible outcome as a result of their withdrawal. In this sense it ends up becoming, if done knowingly and willingly, true and proper euthanasia by omission.
In this regard, I recall what I wrote in the Encyclical Evangelium Vitae, making it clear that "by euthanasia in the true and proper sense must be understood an action or omission which by its very nature and intention brings about death, with the purpose of eliminating all pain"; such an act is always "a serious violation of the law of God, since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human person" (n. 65).
I guess that leaves babies in the lurch. (No bottle, no teat, 'cause that's sustenance and hydration..)
More poorly written law.
Where did you get the idea that sustenance and hydration are classified as medical treatments, according to Florida law? Nowhere in Florida Law does it state that food and water are medical treatments. However, food and water are required by law. Therapy is required by law. The laws which are actually on the books have been ignored or lied about.