I pointed to a tree, and asked my dog "what's that?" He said "bark!"
Apparently you've not seen the video I'm referring to. There's a difference between opening your eyes and opening them wide. If you believe your dog said bark, you need help.
Thus proving that he is not a vegetable, but a living thing. Vegetables don't say or do anything.
Do you understand that the "selectively edited" argument is fallacious?
If I show you a video of what you claim is an artichoke, and on that video the artichoke laughs and smiles, is "But that video was selectively edited" a good counterargument?