Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals vs. liberals - (more on the Susan Estrich L.A.Times flap)
WASHINGTON TIMES.COM ^ | MARCH 17, 2005 | BURT PRELUTSKY

Posted on 03/17/2005 9:23:32 AM PST by CHARLITE

Out here, in Los Angeles, we have recently been treated to a colossal hissy fit that had liberals gunning for other liberals. One would think that any right-thinking conservative would happily sit back and watch the blood run in the gutters. But even in a battle royal that pits lefties against their own kind, a fair-minded person can't help taking sides. On one side, you have the knee-jerk liberal editors at the L.A. Times wearing the white trunks or, in this case, at least the white hats. On the other side, you have the idly rich women of the Westside — most of them the wives or ex-wives of multimillionaires like Michael Huffington, Bud Yorkin and Larry David. They're the sort of ladies who, because they might have undocumented maids, nannies and gardeners from Mexico and Guatemala working for them, not only favor open borders, but believe they're in line for canonization. These are the knuckleheads who support NOW and the ACLU, and who yammer about fossil fuels and the ozone layer while they gad about in SUVs and private jets.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: internal; latimes; liberals; michaelkinsley; squabbling; susanestrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2005 9:23:40 AM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
The worst thing about Miss Estrich and the other members of her overly pampered platoon is that they're hypocrites.

No, Burt. The worst thing about them is that they're totalitarians and elitists. Hypocrisy (or inconsistency) is just a distraction ... it's the agenda that really matters.

2 posted on 03/17/2005 9:35:13 AM PST by Tax-chick (Private enterprise or private charity ... SAY NO TO SOCIALISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters!


3 posted on 03/17/2005 9:37:37 AM PST by Tacis ("John ("What SF-180?") Kerry - Still Shilling For Those Who Would Harm America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters!

WHOO WHOO!

4 posted on 03/17/2005 9:41:37 AM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

"When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters!"

You have a heathy and balanced perspective, sir. Have a saint Patty's Day pint and a Bushmills on me!


5 posted on 03/17/2005 9:42:12 AM PST by Mongeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
No, the worst thing about Miss Estrich is her voice. (Second is her looks.)

I can't take credit for this, but someone not long ago described Estrich's voice as Harvery Fierstein doing Carol Channing. Oddly enough, I think that's a pretty far description.

TS

6 posted on 03/17/2005 9:52:15 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (Anyone going to Lunacon, March 18-20, 2005 in NJ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
the worst thing about Miss Estrich is her voice

Dang, that's the truth! We had to turn off the sound on election night, and I even took off my glasses so I didn't have to look at her.

7 posted on 03/17/2005 9:53:41 AM PST by Tax-chick (Private enterprise or private charity ... SAY NO TO SOCIALISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

When she starts talking, I am immediately reminded of the face of a 50 pound channel catfish.


8 posted on 03/17/2005 9:59:07 AM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2

LOL - I've seen that catfish. Looked like he (she? - do catfish have gender?) could swallow a toddler in one gulp.


9 posted on 03/17/2005 10:02:03 AM PST by Tax-chick (Private enterprise or private charity ... SAY NO TO SOCIALISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2

I was thinking more along the lines of a monkfish...


10 posted on 03/17/2005 10:05:32 AM PST by astounded (We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

Hey!! Can I get one those Bushmill's on you??


11 posted on 03/17/2005 10:14:19 AM PST by chesley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters!

I thought ALL liberals were big boobs.

12 posted on 03/17/2005 10:19:49 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I've read Burt's book. It was very good.


13 posted on 03/17/2005 12:07:23 PM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

14 posted on 03/17/2005 12:09:51 PM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

15 posted on 03/17/2005 12:11:18 PM PST by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

But, but, but...Michael Kinsley is at a disadvantage here...no hooters.

I do think he and Ralph Nader share the same pair of glasses though.


16 posted on 03/17/2005 12:12:44 PM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

LOLOLOL!!!! Excellent choice!!


17 posted on 03/17/2005 12:19:57 PM PST by PaRebel (Cosmos/chaos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

Wow. That is one scary picture. Estrich is hypocritical and unreasonable, and from what I have read on this debate, willing to use despicable tactics. Apparently, she has threatened defamation lawsuits over this whole thing already.. and she's the one who is using her opponent's illness in the debate!


18 posted on 03/17/2005 12:21:16 PM PST by LiveBait
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LiveBait; Tacis; ChadGore; nothingnew; ThreePuttinDude; Congressman Billybob; jan in Colorado; ...

Does anyone know if Fox has fired her? Has she been seen on Fox since Nov. 2nd? She was a "regular," but I haven't seen her recently.


19 posted on 03/17/2005 3:05:24 PM PST by CHARLITE (Women are powerful; freedom is beautiful.........and STUPID IS FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

If you're a liberal, why would you take on the L.A. Times?


20 posted on 03/17/2005 3:06:29 PM PST by mowkeka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson