[Coop]

I heard Geraldo yesterday on Hannity's show, and he came across as quite fair.

[pgkdan]

If he seemed fair on Hannity's show it must be because of all the heat he's been taking about his absolutely fawning approach to Jackson. I saw him last week with Rita Cosby and they were both absolutely disgusting. They reported every rumor and allegation about the family of the accuser they could come up with and DEFENDED Jackson's right to sleep with little boys if he wants to.

I thought Geraldo had plumbed the depths of journalistic prostitution with his Clinton coverage but he's gone way, way beyond that now.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

The fact that he does a feature story sympathetic of a celebrity who is on trial for child molestation is unfair to the judicial process on the whole. Don't you think this was possibly intended to sway public sentiment in order to sway the jury? How is that fair at all? Jackson's life story is irrelevant to the case and thus the piece can be taken only in this light. As the article states, why Jackson and not someone else, such as the teachers who are on trial for having had affairs with their students?

Does he plan to be 'fair' and balance this story with a feature story on the victims? Somehow I doubt that he's that 'fair.' I'm not trying to flame you. It's just that this stinks to high heaven of another OJ trial where someone blatantly guilty of a crime walks scot-free because they are a celebrity.