Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/02/2005 10:19:34 AM PST by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc
OFF!, With their Heads!..it was, so much easier in the 1500s.
2 posted on 03/02/2005 10:28:06 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

FYI..a good read..


3 posted on 03/02/2005 10:40:15 AM PST by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Remember Wm F Buckley's novel,whe the American spy has an affair witht he soon to be British queen?


5 posted on 03/02/2005 10:41:42 AM PST by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Good post.

Dr. D is correct about the monarchy. It appears to be going the way of all flesh...and so it should.

Cheerio old top!


7 posted on 03/02/2005 10:46:53 AM PST by RexBeach (Keep CHRIST In Christmas - Or I'll Hit You With A Cream Pie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Sleeping Beauty, Tom Thumb, and Quasimodo were all talking one day.

Sleeping Beauty said, "I believe myself to be the most beautiful girl in the world."

Tom Thumb said, "I must be the smallest person in the world."

Quasimodo said, "I absolutely have to be the ugliest person in the world."

They decided to go to the Guinness Book of World Records to have their claims verified.

Sleeping Beauty went first and came out looking deliriously happy. "It's official, I AM the most beautiful girl in the world."

Tom Thumb went next and emerged triumphant, "I am officially the smallest person in the world."

Sometime later, a confused-looking Quasimodo came out and said, "Who is Camilla Parker Bowles?"


9 posted on 03/02/2005 11:02:58 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

The British monarchy only survived into the 20th century as the embodiment of British public school values.

It seems to me that the British system was based on a romanticization of the kind of collective child-rearing the Spartans practiced, where boys were taken from their families and raised in barracks to turn them into hardened warriors... and emotional cripples. The upside of all that emotional deprivation and steely emotional control is to convince you that you are a stronger, superior being to the soft people around you who have feelings. The downside is it makes you insufferably arrogant.

And what if you really aren't superior ? When the Spartans were smashed by the Thebans at Leuctra, when they saw that their system really didn't make them stronger, when they learned that free men can outfight militarists didn't they question the price in human suffering their system asked of them ? What is all that stiff upper lip emotional deprivation worth to be king of a minor power ? What was all that sacrifice and loneliness for since you're not really superior ?

Charles strikes me as a man who feels cheated out of a childhood, out of a normal life, out of the simple freedom to marry the woman he loves, and for what ?


11 posted on 03/02/2005 11:28:08 AM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
What garbage. The Queen and the Royal family have always been our best friends and most loyal supporters. After 9/11 she demanded that our national anthem be played, which was the first time in the history of the Empire an anthem of a foreign nation was played officially.

The Royals are extraordinary people who have dedicated their entire lives to charity and public service. The Left has been trying to abolish it for decades and with it...English history and tradition.

For a conservative publication to print something so vile about this incredible family is disgusting.

12 posted on 03/02/2005 11:36:01 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc; snugs

With Charles marrying Camilla - I can see the Brits revolting about Charles being King. I get the impression a lot of Brits still blame Charles for Diana's death.

I can't help but wonder if Charles will be passed over and William will become King. Would the Brits be happier if they saw William taking the throne as somehow justice for Diana ..??


13 posted on 03/02/2005 11:42:27 AM PST by CyberAnt (Pres. Bush: "Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
her eldest son? The Monarchy's

twilight?


17 posted on 03/02/2005 11:59:45 AM PST by TheForceOfOne (Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Duty Calls: It certainly calls Elizabeth II

And Her Majesty responds, 'Howdy, Duty!"

24 posted on 03/02/2005 12:16:17 PM PST by Jagman (Remember, mi nami es Tsunami!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

One hopes that QE II outlives Charles.


27 posted on 03/02/2005 12:29:00 PM PST by Mike Darancette (MESOCONS FOR RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

A reminder for everyone: Theodore Dalrymple is British himself.


50 posted on 03/04/2005 3:44:52 PM PST by NZerFromHK ("US libs...hypocritical, naive, pompous...if US falls it will be because of these" - Tao Kit (HK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc; MadIvan; kingsurfer; Churchillspirit

The Prince’s own son, Harry, is further proof that the Royal Family is not immune to generational change or wider cultural influences. Pictures of Prince Harry, with his vulgar snarling expression, and reports of his less than amusing exploits, prove that he is fundamentally no different from so many of his British compatriots: drunken, arrogant, violent, and charmless.

Britain, please us another Sir Cecil Rhodes, Benjamin Disraeli, Hudson Taylor, or Rudyard Kipling! The current OASIS, david Beckham metrosexual generation is yet another manifestion of Britain's cultural and moral decline.

52 posted on 03/04/2005 4:02:29 PM PST by NZerFromHK ("US libs...hypocritical, naive, pompous...if US falls it will be because of these" - Tao Kit (HK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

I thought the author would include Charles's self pitying remarks (paraphrased, since I can't recall his exact words), of a few years ago that he was sick and tired of having to explain himself to the public. The implication: He's royalty, above explaining his behavior to those who foot his bills, and they're the 'vulgar masses', lower than the dirt on his boots. Camilla's crazy to have stuck with Charles all these years. He has nothing to recommend him. Nothing. Well, they say water seeks its own level, or do I mean lowest level?


58 posted on 03/05/2005 3:22:10 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson