I hope you are right but am afraid that women will vote for her in large numbers.No offense to anyone here but many women still vote with their hearts not their heads.The security mom may be gone by that time and those women who are not deeply politically affiliated may think they owe it to her or that she will be representative of them.
If women go for her in the 60% range that will be quite a hurdle to overcome.
Add to this the usual liberal groups and we have an enormous task ahead.
But she (it) will have the full weght of the media, the gays, Hollyweird, and George Soros' money behind her (it). Not to mention her (its) proven abilities to launder donations from the Chinese communists and her (its) ever-present team of war-room attack dogs.
"No right mind conservative will change their mind to go for that broad, and she will attract only the same brain dead that Lurch did."
There are a lot of voters who voted for Reagan, George H Bush, and George W Bush, but voted for Bill Clinton twice in between. W's victory hinged upon a fairly sizeable number of voters who weren't "right minded conservatives."
Also don't forget that Hillary will be dividing and conquering the right, just as her hubby did with Perot. Her recent comments about illegal immigration hint that this tactic (which John Kerry never figured out) will likely be utilized again.
It's the swing voters, not the conservative voters that could put her in office.
Political memory has a short half life. Swing voters typically pay attention a few months or weeks before the election. What she did 5 or 10 years ago would be irrelevant to them, particularly in light of the fact the MSM will refuse to report it, or make her answere any difficult questions.
Only the blogers stand between Hillary and the White House.