1 posted on
02/26/2005 4:53:33 PM PST by
CHARLITE
To: nothingnew
2 posted on
02/26/2005 4:54:37 PM PST by
CHARLITE
(glad to see lib Dem rats on sinking ship, unable to disembark)
To: CHARLITE
(Of course, Im sure it didnt help the movies chances that Mel Gibson refused to campaign for it. But I think many of us found his attitude a rather satisfying rejoinder to all the people who hated the movie but nevertheless felt it their duty to tell him how he should spend the profits from it.)
This is spin, and an extremely important point which pretty much squashes the argument. In Hollywood, if you don't campaign for an Oscar, you ain't getting one. Look at Michael Moore--no one can tell me he is not loved by Hollywood, yet he deliberately avoided the Best Doc category (and put the movie on TV before the allowed date) to get Best Pic. He failed because of the politics of wanting to give those noms to movies with directors and producers who could give the Academy members work (and hwo are the voters friends).
I didn't know Gibson didn't campaign; this puts a whole other reality on the table. Not campaigning is a snub of the process, and is flipping them the bird. No wonder they didn't nominate the movie.
3 posted on
02/26/2005 5:01:56 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
To: CHARLITE
The Passion was the last movie I saw in theaters. I don't care if I see another movie or not at the theater.
4 posted on
02/26/2005 5:02:31 PM PST by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
To: CHARLITE
"A scene where Kinsey confesses his infidelity with a male assistant (Peter Sarsgaard) establishes [his wife] as the audience surrogate, an emotional victim of his hurtful philosophy that not all sex has to be sanctioned by love. . . . But her acceptance of her husbands behavior slyly foreshadows the sexual revolution.
YECH! Thanks for the warning.
Doesn't Luara Linney play the wife? There's something hot about her...
5 posted on
02/26/2005 5:03:11 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
To: CHARLITE
I'm a subscriber to Premiere (a movie magazine). When the Premiere magazine critic gave "The Passion" a 0 star rating, I canceled my subscription.
If they are too blind to see past their prejudices, then I want nothing to do with them.
6 posted on
02/26/2005 5:05:54 PM PST by
mowkeka
To: CHARLITE
I didn't see it, I don't go to movies.
I heard it was very moving, though.
Also I hear that there will be a released "tamed" version...
To: CHARLITE
Part of it is political, of course. Another part of it is that in the postmodern age there are hardly any sensible critics left: of literature, of art, of drama, of movies. The critics who dominate the academy and the media today wouldn't know good art from bad art if they saw it.
"There's no accounting for taste" is an old saying. It sure is true today.
9 posted on
02/26/2005 5:09:01 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: CHARLITE
The Passion has three mentions -cinematography, makeup and score.
USA Today writes: "Drug addiction, mercy killing, mental illness, genocide, abortion, ill young mothers and borderline alcoholism these are a few of Oscar's favorite things this year".
To: CHARLITE
Bottom line........Mel laughed all the way to the bank. It is also the last movie I saw on the screen. Most actors are not worth a penny, because of their attitudes.
11 posted on
02/26/2005 5:19:57 PM PST by
marmar
(Even though I may look different then you...my blood runs red, white and blue.....)
To: CHARLITE
Who cares?
You can't claim to despise Hollywood values and then clamor for their approval. Being left out is a GOOD thing.
13 posted on
02/26/2005 6:07:23 PM PST by
SJSAMPLE
To: CHARLITE; xzins; P-Marlowe; Revelation 911; connectthedots; fortheDeclaration; HairOfTheDog; ...
You know, "The Passion" is an incredible movie. I would have loved to see it win the top honors.
But something within me just tells me that Jesus isn't all that worried about Oscar. He's more concerned that we're still not getting His message.
18 posted on
02/26/2005 7:45:41 PM PST by
Corin Stormhands
(One Iraqi purple finger took more courage than John Kerry's three purple hearts.)
To: CHARLITE
A scene where Kinsey confesses his infidelity with a male assistant (Peter Sarsgaard) establishes [his wife] as the audience surrogate, an emotional victim of his hurtful philosophy that not all sex has to be sanctioned by love. . . . But her acceptance of her husbands behavior slyly foreshadows the sexual revolution.Did anyone see this? It sounds like a cheaply made porn movie.
20 posted on
02/27/2005 12:30:31 AM PST by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson