Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Downs Dummy Ballistic Missile in Successful Test
Reuters ^ | 24FEB05 | Jim Wolf

Posted on 02/24/2005 5:55:22 PM PST by familyop

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A missile fired from a U.S. Navy ship off Kauai, Hawaii, intercepted and destroyed a mock warhead on Thursday, the fifth success in six such test of the fledgling U.S. anti-missile shield's sea-based leg, the Pentagon announced.

"We had a successful hit-to-kill intercept," said Richard Lehner, a spokesman for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency.

The target was tracked from the cruiser Lake Erie using the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Weapon System developed by Lockheed Martin Corp. It was launched from the U.S. Pacific Missile Range Facility at Barking Sands, Kauai.

The ship fired a Standard Missile (SM)-3 at the target outside the earth's atmosphere during the descent phase of flight, Lockheed said. Raytheon Co. is developing the SM-3.

The Defense Department plans to field up to 30 SM-3 missiles on Aegis-equipped ships by 2007 to destroy short- and medium-range ballistic missiles in mid-flight. Other systems are being developed to defend at different stages.

For the ground-based mid-course leg of ballistic missile defense, managed for the Pentagon by Boeing Co., five of eight shoot down tests have been completed successfully.

Interceptor missiles failed to launch from their silos in the last two ground-based tests because of hardware and software glitches.

The Pentagon plans to spend roughly $10 billion a year over the next five years on all aspects of missile defense. The initial "layered" shield is designed to thwart missiles that could be fired from North Korea, possibly tipped with nuclear, chemical or germ warheads.

Last fall, the Japan-based Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Curtis Wilbur became the first component of the anti-missile shield to be put on patrol in the Sea of Japan to guard against North Korean attack.

Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed, the Pentagon's No. 1 supplier, calls Aegis the world's premier naval defense system, capable of defending against air, surface and underwater threats.

Currently deployed on 68 U.S. Navy cruisers and destroyers, the Aegis system is also being supplied to Spain, Japan, South Korea, Norway and Australia.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aegis; lockheedmartin; miltech; missiledefense; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2005 5:55:26 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; Southack; TapTheSource
Ping
2 posted on 02/24/2005 5:56:57 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

did the war head come from vandenberg?


3 posted on 02/24/2005 5:57:03 PM PST by al baby (Dick Trickle is not just a medical condition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
So funny how you don't hear about this on the news but every time they fail it makes the cut.
4 posted on 02/24/2005 5:58:48 PM PST by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Tommy Dashole, Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry, Rangel et al are very sad.
5 posted on 02/24/2005 5:59:22 PM PST by b4its2late (This is like deja vu all over again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
OUTSTANDING!


6 posted on 02/24/2005 5:59:34 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

My first thought!


7 posted on 02/24/2005 6:00:22 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
So funny how you don't hear about this on the news but every time they fail it makes the cut.

Isn't that interesting that it works that way in the MSM.

8 posted on 02/24/2005 6:02:56 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Boy, it must be a trip to be on the bridge for that shot, eh???

Heh, brings out the pyro in all of us!


9 posted on 02/24/2005 6:03:11 PM PST by rlmorel (Teresa Heinz-Kerry, better known as Kerry's "Noisy Two Legged ATM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Yet another advanced technology we'll have to block from Europeans going forward if they start selling arms to China.


10 posted on 02/24/2005 6:03:36 PM PST by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Although I consider the decision short-sighted and obtuse (yes, I am Canadian), the government of Canada officially turned down an invitation to involve itself with missle defense today. Everything from technical feasibility issues to it leading to the weaponization of space were cited as reasons.

Does anyone else find it odd that this "success" occurred on the very day that Canada said "no, eh"?


11 posted on 02/24/2005 6:05:21 PM PST by canadianally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: happyathome

at least we don't have to worry about the Canadians wanting this anymore......


12 posted on 02/24/2005 6:05:23 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I worked on THAADS in the early 90's. We could have had these capabilities 10 years ago...but guess who got in the way and cut it off. That's right, the toon.


13 posted on 02/24/2005 6:05:48 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: familyop

One of these days, one of these things is going to save about a million liberals from getting torched. When that happens, it will have been their idea all along.


14 posted on 02/24/2005 6:06:14 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canadianally
Does anyone else find it odd that this "success" occurred on the very day that Canada said "no, eh"?

Did the Canadians inform us of the date that they were going to say no so we could do the many weeks of preparation necessary to conduct such a test? Maybe we asked the Canadians to tell us the date of their announcement so we could prepare in advance for it.
15 posted on 02/24/2005 6:08:17 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Don't worry. Hillary will kill the project and use the savings to fund additional social programs.


16 posted on 02/24/2005 6:08:22 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: canadianally

That's okay.

You can pick up the parts that fall in Canada after we shoot it down over Canadian airspace ;)


17 posted on 02/24/2005 6:08:34 PM PST by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

No Hitlery won't, she will not get the chance...Condolisa will forge ahead with it...LOL!


18 posted on 02/24/2005 6:09:42 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Boy, does it burn my butt that Hilliary is doing a makeover that is going to fool a lot of people. I would like to think that a lot of people won't fall for it, but I know a lot will.

To see her on the Senate Armed Services Committee is enough to make me grind all my teeth to stubs. God help us.


19 posted on 02/24/2005 6:10:49 PM PST by rlmorel (Teresa Heinz-Kerry, better known as Kerry's "Noisy Two Legged ATM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: canadianally
Well, now instead of, if worse comes to worse and God forbid, interception are made, instead of radioactive material falling to earth over the arctic, they will fall to earth over Canadian soil if they come in over the pole.

Yes, I would say that is rather short sighted.

20 posted on 02/24/2005 6:11:43 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson