Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians Seeking 'True Conservatives'
GOPUSA ^

Posted on 02/24/2005 6:27:01 AM PST by Happy2BMe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-292 next last
To: Antoninus

So that other nonsense you made up about libertarians being libertines is out? I haven't seen you apologise or withdraw that BS yet.


221 posted on 02/24/2005 12:15:07 PM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"Leaning" libertarian isn't "being" libertarian. Bush's purposed guest worker program is just a not particularly clever way to funnel welfare to Mexico. Not libertarian at all. No one gets a handout under a libertarian system.

No one...

222 posted on 02/24/2005 12:16:14 PM PST by Dead Corpse (The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Me neither. Oddly, that was one thing I was hoping Bush would come around on. The War on Terror is a big concern. His leaving the border open the way it is verges on inexcusable.


223 posted on 02/24/2005 12:17:31 PM PST by Dead Corpse (The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

beep beep *CLICK*

DRUGS!!!!! ILLEGAL ALIENS!! DRUGS!! DRUGS!!! ILLEGALS!!!!

*CLICK* beep beep

(end FR libertarian thread inserto-matic bot)


224 posted on 02/24/2005 12:19:00 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod ( I'm going to open Cobra Kai dojos all over this valley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Matching "willing worker with willing employer" is very libertarian in philosophy. The Wall St. Journal has been pushing that concept since the eighties.

What he's trying to do with Mexico in propping it up is a separate issue that conservatives oppose as well. Could be he's attempting to kill two birds with one stone, both of which are bound to fail.

225 posted on 02/24/2005 12:23:36 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

I'm for upping immigration quotas to help feed worker demand. Not just flinging open the border and allowing them full access to welfare/medicare/social security. Also, people willing to INVADE us in a criminal enterprise are NOT the kind of people we want coming here. Period.


226 posted on 02/24/2005 12:33:10 PM PST by Dead Corpse (The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
There's no law that says legal immigration quotas have to remain at a set level, they can go up or down as needed.

My take on matching "willing worker with willing empoyer" is that there are no quotas, if a job opens and no one applies for it then it's gets advertised to the world. The official libertarian line is in full agreement with that and has been for years.

There are it appears differing opinions among libertarians about the wiseness of such a policy but the fundamental philosophy of the party is that free movement of people, even if it is to be done only at legal checkpoints and not through the backdoor is just fine.

227 posted on 02/24/2005 12:48:31 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Until a strong, pro-life plank is added to the Libertarian platform, they will NEVER get my vote. Is that so hard to understand?

Then you might like the Constitution Party, basically they're pro-life Libertarians.

228 posted on 02/24/2005 12:55:00 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Well, yeah? Aren't we saying the same thing over and over again here? If they want to come here. Let them. But make them do it LEGALLY. Not just jump the border and have at it. That is trespassing by anyones definition.

It's also what the President seems to be advocating we allow them to do. Or at least excusing them if they get caught. Above and beyond even that is the Presidents proposal to fork over our tax money to them. That money should see to our own national needs BEFORE it is ever considered for use elsewhere. Without a few billion going to Africa, a few more billion going to South America, and only the Gods know what else in foreign aid giveaways... we could probably get the budget way back under $2 trillion again. Easily.

$68 BILLION was lost because of illegals sucking up resources. Their taxes from picking turnips isn't gonna put a dent in that. Especially once they start drawing even more benefits legally. This'll make the Presidents Viagra give-away look frugal by comparison.

229 posted on 02/24/2005 1:04:02 PM PST by Dead Corpse (The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
$68 BILLION was lost because of illegals sucking up resources. Their taxes from picking turnips isn't gonna put a dent in that. Especially once they start drawing even more benefits legally.

Illegal immigration has got to be stopped but at the same time we have to keep legal immigration quotas in place. No way could I support open-ended immigration, even if it's legal.

Everything else you say is correct, stop the foreign giveaways and end the welfare.

230 posted on 02/24/2005 1:36:10 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
OPINION: A message expressing a belief about something; the expression of a belief that is held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof

And of course "humble" means "not arrogant"...but you probably wouldn't know anything about that. /sarcasm
231 posted on 02/24/2005 1:37:15 PM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Agreement at last. Ending the welfare fraud is something else libertarians are big on. A hand up is one thing, but the hand outs have GOT to stop. Absent that, the "legal" immigrants would be less of a problem than you might think.


232 posted on 02/24/2005 2:00:43 PM PST by Dead Corpse (The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
"The Twenty-First amendment expressly granted a federal power to assist in the enforcement of state prohibition. Yet more proof that the federal government had hitherto had no such power."

Hmmmm. A federal power to assist in the enforcement of state prohibition? Boy that sounds a lot like the 1913 Webb-Kenyon Act.

Hitherto that!

233 posted on 02/24/2005 2:49:06 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

"Greed IS good. What on earth are you doing in FR (instead of DU) if you have a problem with people getting rich?"

Ayn Rand notwithstanding, greed is NOT good. Self-interest is OK and understandable but greed is a sickness of the mind and soul. Rand's creed is I, I, I, I, I ... It doesn't work if everyone follows it.

I have no problem with people getting rich.

What the libertarians can't understand - at least until they grow up - is that man is a social being and to maximize individual liberty (licience) with no thought given to one's fellow man is to invite chaos which then can quickly turn into totalitarianism.

When you maximize individual liberty (right to porn, whores, drugs, movement across borders, etc.), the equation becomes: libertarianism = tyranny. That's how the world works.

And by the way, libertarians will NEVER take over the GOP. The best they can do is influence the party on the margins.




234 posted on 02/24/2005 2:56:56 PM PST by Pittsburg Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 54-46 Was My Number

Well I though I'd just cut to the chase, rather than dickin' around.


235 posted on 02/24/2005 2:58:53 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
OPINION: A message expressing a belief about something; the expression of a belief that is held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof

Yep. Particularly that last part.

Opinions formed from ignorance have plenty of reason to be humble.

236 posted on 02/24/2005 4:27:21 PM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Pittsburg Phil
What the libertarians can't understand - at least until they grow up - is that man is a social being and to maximize individual liberty (licience) with no thought given to one's fellow man is to invite chaos which then can quickly turn into totalitarianism.

Libertarians don't believe in the things you pretend they believe in. The one who needs to grow up is you. Your ideas about things are quite childish.

237 posted on 02/24/2005 4:30:03 PM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
No doubt you're a libertarian...as they - like liberals - get bent out of shape if everyone doesn't cow-tow to them

Knowing people are aware the word is spelled "kotow", although "kow-tow" may be acceptable in vulgar usage.

238 posted on 02/24/2005 5:17:43 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: frgoff
Bork argues that the second amendment can be interpreted either way, and he's correct.

The right way, and the Bork way.

239 posted on 02/24/2005 5:28:44 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
" Conservatism and open borders, which the Libertarian party supports are like oil and vinegar, they don't mix."

============================================

I agree with the first part of that. And the last part of it. And the middle part of it also.

Which part does the President not get?

240 posted on 02/24/2005 7:07:34 PM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson