|
Posted on 02/23/2005 4:57:16 PM PST by kristinn
Two leaders of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee want the federal prosecutor investigating the Valeria Plame case to subpoena a personal journal of controversial White House reporter James Guckert, following Editor & Publisher's disclosure yesterday that Guckert claims he kept the journal for the past two years.
"It is clear that a primary obstacle to the ... investigation is uncovering a precise chronology of when, and to whom, classified information was leaked," Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), one of those seeking the subpoena, told E&P. "The revelation by Editor & Publisher that Mr. Guckert kept contemporaneous records of his 'reporting' activities could well be a major step forward in developing such a chronology."
In addition, E&P has confirmed an online report that Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) is circulating a letter among his colleagues that asks President Bush to launch an investigation into how Guckert, who writes under the byline “Jeff Gannon,” gained access to White House press briefings over two years despite having no journalism background and using a false name.
Both letters are just the latest in a string of inquiries by congressional leaders, which have included a previous request by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) for documents related to Guckert's continued White House access.
In the latest effort, Conyers and Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) sent a joint letter today to Patrick Fitzgerald, the prosecutor investigating who leaked the identity of Plame, a CIA agent, to several reporters. Guckert, who worked for GOPUSA.com and Talon News before resigning two weeks ago, interviewed Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, last year.
Guckert has been interviewed by FBI agents on the Plame case and given conflicting signals, over many months, concerning whether he saw a secret document or merely knew about it from other sources.
Conyers and Slaughter indicated in their letter that Guckert's journal might contain information of value to the Plame investigation if, in fact, Guckert had been given some sort of access to documents related to the Plame leaks.
"A person in the White House briefing room who had access to a memo revealing the operative’s name also kept a journal of his days covering the White House," the letter to Fitzgerald stated. "We bring this to your attention because we believe your office may need to subpoena the journal to further the work of the grand jury."
"It now appears that Mr. Guckert memorialized his experiences at the White House," the letter added, noting Guckert's comments to E&P that he might turn the journal into a book. "It would be unfortunate if Mr. Guckert published information that would be useful to your investigation, such as the identity of the person who gave him the memo, without your office having the benefit of its contents."
Durbin, meanwhile, is hoping to send Bush his letter demanding that the president investigate how Guckert was able to attend regular press briefings despite working for a Web site with obvious partisan support for the Republican Party, the senator's office confirmed to E&P, after the existence of the letter was first reported at the Raw Story online site.
"We have ... learned that the questions he posed at White House press briefings and the stories he filed for Talon News frequently mirrored Republican Party talking points, that Talon News is a news organization in name only and that it has apparently close connections to the Republican party," Durbin's letter states. "Given the unprecedented level of security in Washington since 9/11, it is troubling that that a non-journalist using a false name and working for a sham news organization could have gained regular access to the White House for such an extended period of time.
"We respectfully request that you order an immediate and thorough investigation into the Gannon/Guckert matter," Durbin declares in the letter. "How is it possible that a man using a fake name, with dubious journalism credentials, was able to clear the White House’s extensive security screening process and gain such close access to you and your staff for such an extended period of time? Have there been other, similar breaches of security and journalism standards? We appreciate your prompt attention to this important matter. We urge you to order a full inquiry so that the American people know the facts."
Oh, good, Conyers is going to look even more stupid than he does already. Please no one alert him to the fact that no crime was commited. It might spoil the fun.
Heh heh heh. Keep diggin', Dems, keep diggin'....
Rats in Both Houses of Congress Get Involved in 'Gannon' Case
There we go.
LOL!
Oh, fer cryin' out loud! Can't they get anything right?
Actually it is clear this is what is presenting an obstacle:
Appeals Court Upholds Ruling in CIA Leak
The refusal of reporters the grand jury REALLY wants to hear from to testify.
By all means, call Gannon, too, but somehow the grand jury isn't too interested in such peripheral figures to the matter.
|
Hmm...
Just yesterday, Feb. 22, Gannon mentioned for the first time the "journal" to this same publication, E & P. So within 24 hours the Dem networks have Senators writing about this specious matter. They're in full witch-hunt mode.
BTW, who's advising the Democrats to spend time on this? The same advisors who advised Kerry to publicly slaughter more geese?
I wouldn't be so sure. That the leaking of Plame's name may not be criminal (I've posted all along it was not), but I wouldn't be so sure that other behavior pertaining to the story is not criminal.
We shall see. But yes, Conyers is playing the fool. That is for sure.
I love that! It's like saying that Willie couldn't have had sex with Monica because she "has no prostitution background."
No, they can't!
LOL
I just can't believe they believe their own press releases, but evidently it is so.
LOL (some more)
Interesting. Any clues?
One has to suspect there is good reason for this.
E & P has been a huge revelation throughout this matter.
Very in the tank. Completely discredited themselves, IMO.
They have always been in the tank for them.
Is that the best "scandal" they can come up with? What laws were broken? What evidence do they have? The fantastic , raving speculation of the left-wing blogosphere?
Well, what can we expect from a party whose 2004 presidential candidate still claims that 1 million blacks were prevented from voting in Florida in 2000 despite the fact that no evidence has ever existed to support such a claim.
You left off your sarcasm tag.
Oh, I figure the leaking of classifed information as well as disinformation from the rogues in government to a complicit media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
So Editor & Publisher goes into the tank for the Democrats. Gee, what a surprise.