Posted on 02/22/2005 8:58:15 AM PST by pabianice
'Fight crime' plate on car at school has some parents fuming
LOWELL, MA -- An employee's car parked at Abraham Lincoln Elementary School lot has sparked fury among some parents ushering their children inside the school each morning.
The car -- a red, late-model Ford Mustang with a novelty plate on its front end reading "Fight crime, shoot first" -- irritated one parent so much that she complained to her son's pre-kindergarten teacher. The parent, who asked to remain anonymous, also took the issue up with school Principal Sandra Dunning earlier this week, as well as Superintendent of Schools Karla Brooks Baehr.
"Being a member of the staff, well, you have to be an example to the kids," the mother insisted. "You don't just do whatever."
"I can listen to parents and listen to their concerns," Dunning said. "But we do live in America. That's part of our democracy, free speech."
The parent, however, says the school's responsibility to provide positive role models to children supersedes the right to free speech, and that the offending license plate is a breech of the public trust placed in school employees.
"I don't think it's just a question of freedom of speech," the mother said, noting that while her son is still learning to read, the school's older students have full reading ability. "You don't leave it for the kids to see every day."
The First Amendment of the Constitution, which protects freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition and was added in 1791, stipulates that Congress shall not "(abridge) the freedom of speech."
According to Taylor Flynn, a Northeastern University professor and expert in Constitutional law, the school employee with the plate might actually find favor if the case found its way into court, particularly because, in her view, the evidence that students' education is being disrupted by the plate is on the lean side.
"However, I think there is a fairly strong possibility that a court would find that the staff person's First Amendment rights are being violated if the employee feels (directly or indirectly) coerced into covering the plate or is doing so over her objection."
Principal Dunning, who admitted she was "a little surprised" by the plate, initially echoed Flynn's concerns, saying that such a message might be considered inappropriate if it entered the building. But outside? Dunning said that's a different matter entirely.
"If anything disrupts the educational process, we do have the right to ask staff and teachers to maintain a code of conduct," she said. "What is parked in a lot or on a street is a different matter, however. Whatever happens in the building we have control over."
"I think it's inappropriate," she said. "I think we all take responsibility to model appropriate language and behavior. Yes, they see all sorts of things on TV, in ads, that lots of people would find inappropriate as a model for a 5- or 6-year-old. But having (the license plate) there in the lot suggests we condone it."
The solution? Dunning and Baehr plan to mandate that the staff member somehow cover the plate upon arrival each morning, possibly with magnets and a cloth. The plate will be covered by the first day of school after February break, Feb. 28, Behr said.
"I expect cooperation on the part of the staff members to cover it up or obscure it in some way," Baehr said.
And when the staff member is not on school property -- and by that, Baehr means either in the building or in the parking lot -- "she's free to do as she pleases."
The parent who initially complained said she was happy with that solution, though put off that "going public" with the story was the route to compromise.
"I'm aggravated because they only did something when I said I was going to talk to The Sun," the mother said. "I feel that I had to go outside the school to solve a little problem, because this could have been solved within the school."
Christine Phelan's e-mail address is cphelan@lowellsun.com.
email at: tjmccarthy@ci.lowell.ma.us
"...the evidence that students' education is being disrupted by the plate is on the lean side. "
was she parking her car in the classroom?
It is astonishing just how many maggots reside in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. So very many of them are just cowardly whiners.
There. No I've said it, and I'm glad.
Ugh.
>>was she parking her car in the classroom?<<
Apparently!
IMO these people have waaaaaaaaaaay too much time on their hands, they really need to get over themselves I can't stand the PC crowd.
How about this one...the motto of their neighbor state...
LIVE FREE OR DIE!
They gonna ban that too?
In some jurisdictions, you can not cover up your license plates as the cops 'need to' see them as they drive by. A friend got a big cost ticket after putting a car cover on his sports car one night for this egregious offense.
I think this 'unidentified' mom needs a cranial-rectal ectomy.
Actually, being ready to shoot (and having the perps know it) is practically a guarantee that you'll never need to do it. Visualize somebody telling THAT to those impressionable little moppets....
Had the plate said "Kill the Troops", these folks would have defended the courageous display of free speech.
If it were an anti-war, anti-Bush or pro-Ward Churchill plate there'd be a Teacher of the Year/Free Speech/whatever award on the way.
I guess they'd also ban anti-abortion bumper stickers and such, but whaddya wanna bet they'd have no problem with "choice" or pro-homosexual displays?
The taxpayers in this school district had either a) tell these busybodies to sit down and shut the hell up or b) get themselves prepared for a tax hike which will pay for the settlement of a bigtime lawsuit by the Mustang's owner.
| Quote | The parent, however, says the school's responsibility to provide positive role models to children supersedes the right to free speech |
A while back, there was a substitute teacher driving around Chandler Arizona with the F word on her bumper sticker.
I think she managed to sue someone and get some money out of the deal.
Hey moron, over reacting like a polictically correct jerk sets a worse example for the kids!
I've said it before:
I was amazed to see that they allowed (gasp!) a firearm in the hands of a militia [minuteman] member (gasp again!) to be depicted on the reverse of the Massachusetts state quarter.
They gonna ban that too?
I'm sure they'd like to!
This idiot parent actually believes that he/she represents an objective view of a "positive role model"
That is the scariest part of the story and the best reason I can think of to stop catering to deluded neurotics parents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.