Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Wants Permanent Bases in Afghanistan
Newsmax ^ | 2/22/05

Posted on 02/22/2005 6:50:55 AM PST by areafiftyone

KABUL, Afghanistan -- A senior American lawmaker called Tuesday for permanent U.S. bases in Afghanistan to safeguard American security interests in a region that includes Iran as well as nuclear-armed Pakistan and China.

Sen. John McCain, part of a five-strong U.S. Senate delegation which held talks with President Hamid Karzai, said he was committed to a "strategic partnership that we believe must endure for many, many years.

"Not only for the good of the Afghan people, but also for the good of the American people because of the long-term security interests that we have in the region," McCain told reporters at the presidential palace in the Afghan capital.

Asked what such a partnership would entail, he said: "Economic assistance, technical assistance, military partnership including - and this is a personal view - joint military permanent bases and also cultural exchanges."

McCain, the No. 2 Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, didn't elaborate, and Karzai didn't address the issue at a joint news conference.

Afghanistan's neighbors include Pakistan to the east, Iran to the west and China to the northeast.

Officials from the Afghan government and the U.S.-led military coalition in Afghanistan told The Associated Press earlier this month they are examining a military partnership which could include permanent American bases here.

However, Afghan Defense Minister Rahim Wardak has also requested high-tech weaponry such as attack helicopters and special forces for the new U.S.-trained Afghan National Army to reduce the need for foreign troops.

There are currently about 17,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan, hunting remnants of al-Qaida and the former ruling Taliban.

The Afghan army, which currently numbers about 20,000 and is taking part in counterinsurgency operations in troubled areas near the Pakistani frontier, is to reach its full strength of 70,000 by the end of 2006.

Other members of the U.S. delegation, which arrived in Kabul after stops in Baghdad and Islamabad, also backed long-term U.S.-Afghan ties but gave no specifics.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a New York Democrat, said she hoped to expand a "friendship and partnership which is very important to the United States and something that we believe very strongly is in the interests of both" countries.

Karzai limited himself to expressing thanks.

"It is because of help from the United States that Afghanistan has what it has today: Be it in reconstruction, be it in economy, in elections, in the very fact that this is a country that is now owning itself."

The other senators were Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Russ Feingold, a Democrat from Wisconsin. All but Feingold are members of the Armed Services Committee, which oversees the Defense Department budget.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; militarybases; oef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Jeeze we have the three stooges - McCain, Hillary and Lindsey Graham.
1 posted on 02/22/2005 6:50:58 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Yeah, talk about a softball pitch for a little publicity!

Newsflash senators: permanent bases were already a given.


2 posted on 02/22/2005 6:54:04 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

I bet you dollars to donuts that all three are running in 2008. Lindsey Graham has been chomping at the bit to run for president and will keep his cushy job as Senator - so will Hillary and McCain.


3 posted on 02/22/2005 6:55:14 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Jeeze we have the three stooges - McCain, Hillary and Lindsey Graham.

And we have McCain giving credence to the notion that we want to have a permanent occupying force in the Middle East. The loose cannon on the rolling deck. McCain truly does wear thin very quickly.

4 posted on 02/22/2005 6:56:31 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I think McCain better stick to his other calling 'speech god'.


5 posted on 02/22/2005 6:57:39 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

McCain also proposed that when our tanks run out of gas, we should put more gas in them. Thank you Captain Obvious.


6 posted on 02/22/2005 7:01:27 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
We joked two years ago that when you stepped off the plane at Bagram, you would one day see a sign "Welcome to Afghanistan, The National Guard National Training Center"
7 posted on 02/22/2005 7:05:19 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

How many people did Mc'Cain knock down getting to the microphone and camera's?


8 posted on 02/22/2005 7:07:15 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

What in the world is Hillary doing on the Armed Forces committee? She has no use for people in uniform and proved it when she was taking up space in the white house.


9 posted on 02/22/2005 7:09:49 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

LOL!


10 posted on 02/22/2005 7:22:01 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sax
McCain also proposed that when our tanks run out of gas, we should put more gas in them. Thank you Captain Obvious.

Right!

At least, we know McCain supports, in this case, what is right. We can have permanent bases in both the recently freed countries, and not be an occupying power. It is ridicules for one to think that because the USA funds and uses a base in a county amount to occupation.

We've had such bases in a number of countries and not "occupied" these countries. Usually, the base country benefits economically and are more secure when we have such bases. With time, when the region is pacified, we move on.

The U.S.A. needs bases in these fledging democracies - and they need us - aircraft carriers in the region is not enough.

11 posted on 02/22/2005 7:23:11 AM PST by RAY (They that do right are all heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

It would be nice to have a base in Afghanistan to raid the surrounding countries that have dictatorship or terrorist supporting government, but will the people of Afghanistan accept this?


12 posted on 02/22/2005 7:26:07 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Can McCain spell ME oil?????


13 posted on 02/22/2005 7:28:43 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

As soon as she became Senator that was the first committee she looked to get on. This woman is not stupid. If she is on the armed services committee it looks good for her run for President (at least in the idiot Dems's eyes)


14 posted on 02/22/2005 7:28:55 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

As soon as she became Senator that was the first committee she looked to get on. This woman is not stupid. If she is on the armed services committee it looks good for her run for President (at least in the idiot Dems's eyes)


15 posted on 02/22/2005 7:28:57 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Sorry about the triple post everyone!


16 posted on 02/22/2005 7:29:29 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

My bet is a McCain and Clinton ticket in 2008 although it's hard to say who will lead the ticket. The way they fawned over each other in Iraq leaves little doubt in my mind IMHO.


17 posted on 02/22/2005 7:58:34 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY

You are exactly right.


18 posted on 02/22/2005 8:01:04 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Nah then McCain will have to move to the Democrat Party and then he will lose alot of the moderate Republicans who like him that way. Hillary will never move to the Republican party. She is being advised right now by her Husband to move to the middle. He tried a little to get Kerry to do that but without success but he really didn't care about Kerry. Now his wife is another story. She's his ticket back to the Lincoln Bedroom again!


19 posted on 02/22/2005 8:02:43 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Old Crusty ALERT ...U.S. Senator John McCain (C) speaks as Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (news - web sites) (L) and Afghan President Hamid Karzai (R) look on during a short visit by a U.S. congressional delegation in Kabul, Afghanistan (news - web sites) February 22, 2005. A bipartisan group of U.S. senators pledged long-term support for Afghanistan on Tuesday and influential Republican McCain said he saw the need for permanent joint military bases in the country.
20 posted on 02/22/2005 8:04:07 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson