To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
2 posted on
02/21/2005 1:56:24 PM PST by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: knighthawk
3 posted on
02/21/2005 1:58:58 PM PST by
newgeezer
(Boycott CNN.com. If you don't want to fund the left, do not increment their hit counter.)
To: knighthawk
When she [Hillary ] said recently that believers have the right to live out their faith in the public square, she was taking dead aim at the secularist goal of banishing religion from public life. Horse puckey.
She was taking dead aim at 2008, and the voters she knows don't like the anti-religious fervor of the modern Democrat party.
4 posted on
02/21/2005 2:00:54 PM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: knighthawk
Do they think if they keep discussing the bloggers, we'll forget about the real story here? Jordan had made those claims before, and it's time that Frank and Dodd stopped cow-towing to CNN and just opened up an investigation. CNN is allowing this accusation to be spread as truth around the world, and it is the responsiblity of our government to get to the truth, and address problems IF THEY ARE REAL. If CNN is lying or perpetuating lies, about our military, their license to broadcast in this country should be pulled.
This is not about the bloggers, it's about getting at the truth.
5 posted on
02/21/2005 2:03:40 PM PST by
JesseJane
(Don't Fear the FReeper!)
To: knighthawk
The Clinton News Network will be back in time for 2008, they'll operate in the red for the next 3 years if they have to. They will be 'moderated' just like Hillary, and just as phonily.
7 posted on
02/21/2005 2:06:20 PM PST by
wvobiwan
(Paris Hilton for UN Sec. Gen. - At least we might get laid while we're getting screwed.)
To: knighthawk
"Bloggers as News Media Trophy Hunters," It is after all, a target rich environment.
10 posted on
02/21/2005 2:19:23 PM PST by
staytrue
To: knighthawk
11 posted on
02/21/2005 2:42:07 PM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: knighthawk
No, no, what Mr. Jordan was immaterial, certainly not deserving of resignation. The Wall Street Journal told me so.
To: knighthawk
The simple answer is that if the Lame Stream Media was doing it's job right then the bloggers wouldn't matter.
I guess that people who defend the Lame Stream Media against the bloggers think that the old media should be able to lie with impunity. At least that's the way I understand the various people who defend Eason Jordan.
To: knighthawk
Maybe big media should get used to someone looking over their shoulder. 
14 posted on
02/21/2005 3:37:51 PM PST by
maine-iac7
(."...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: knighthawk
Thanks John Leo, for defending us to those who don't have access to a computer or the truth.
It can't be easy standing up to the New York Times. Especially for the likes of us... Anyhow, thanks again.
15 posted on
02/21/2005 7:27:52 PM PST by
GOPJ
(Liberals haven't had a new idea in 40 years.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson