Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Victor

I'm afraid posting the National Guard is probably what it would take. Sadly, we no longer seem to be a nation "of the people, by the people, for the people." It is now, "of the COURTS, by the COURTS, for the COURTS." Re: the National Guard. That might be effective in the short run, a few days, but in the long run, I don't think that would work either.


15 posted on 02/21/2005 7:22:14 AM PST by ChocChipCookie (Really! I'm just a nice little stay-at-home mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ChocChipCookie
"...That might be effective in the short run, a few days, but in the long run, I don't think that would work either....."

Probably not. On the other hand, it would send a strong message. A strong stand could help the beginning of a culture change; public awareness of the runaway action of judges must be raised!!

22 posted on 02/21/2005 7:50:23 AM PST by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ChocChipCookie

funny you should mention that.
go here:
http://www.constitution.org/usdeclar.htm
and see how many of the "he has" statements can be replaced with "the court has"
a lot of them, certainly.


70 posted on 02/21/2005 12:10:34 PM PST by sonofnun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson