Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

The authors you list were "Communists" were from a different time. Depending on their level of devotion, they would at worst fall under the useful idiot category. I can't see an American who had a problem with poverty like Steinbeck french kissing scum like Castro in the fashion of Spielberg or Stone. Especially in light of the concrete evidence that Spielberg and Stone have of Castro's crimes against the Cuban people(100 million dead from this idealogy-with London, the evils of Communism were not yet as obvious and the full fledged slaughter had not been made common knowledge-thanks to the NYT and it's Pulitzer Prize winning Duranty). It sounds to me like you are a cineaste and can judge a work on it's merits, divorced from the background of the creator. I find that difficult. Leni Riefenstahl comes to mind. I am comparing Castro to Hitler. He is just as evil, fortunately he doesn't have the means Hitler did. Speilberg's devotion to him is sickening. He thinks that a crime was committed against the Jews but he could care less about the Cubans in Castro's gulags. I think my problem is that I feel that movies have supplanted the written or intelligent spoken word in power. Schindler's List is a good example. You are right, you can't, indeed shouldn't, compare it to Schindler's List. Shoah is history. Schindler's List is entertainment. Many people saw SL. Nobody saw Shoah. That is a tragedy. The Holocaust should never be viewed as "entertainment". I realize this example is rather extreme. Ultimately, I really despise Hollywood. When a Hollywood elite such as Sean Penn or Amanda Peet condemn American culture or America as the problem in the world, when it's obvious that what an average, fundementalist Muslim father hates most about America is the crap that Hollywood spews out, I get frustrated. When Speilberg, who has to know what Cubans who have been tortured under Castro's regime have to say about him, still praises him or Stone actually makes a movie celebrating him, it's too much. I suppose that these sentiments account for my taste. Although in truth, I have never seen a movie of his that I truly liked. Even beofre I became political. He caters to a particular mentality. "AI" didn't interest me. "LA Confidential" did. No acounting for taste I suppose.


146 posted on 02/19/2005 5:33:53 PM PST by huac (We're not Communists, we're Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: huac
The Holocaust should never be viewed as "entertainment".

Sounds like Adorno's famous 'There's no poetry after Auschwitz' remark. I disagree. All human experience should be avaialble to the artist. And great art has come out of the Holocaust experience...Elie Weisel's work, Night and Fog.

Amanda Peet is a Hollywood elite? :-) Most people don't know who she is. But why the groupthink? Obviously lots of junk movies come out every year but that has nothing to do with her. It's not a massive team meeting for every piece of schlock. But a varied industry with hundreds of artisans trying to get their vision across in the face of very big odds considering the money involved. But there's lots of people who simply don't like the medium of film and that's fine.
159 posted on 02/19/2005 8:17:29 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson