Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio Producer Could Always Count on 'Gannon' for Tips
Editor and Publisher ^ | 2/18/05

Posted on 02/18/2005 1:33:59 PM PST by areafiftyone

San Antonio radio producer Susan Farris could always count on James Guckert, a.k.a. former White House correspondent Jeff Gannon, to pitch an appearance on the shows she produces at conservative talk station KTSA.

He was not only anxious about pushing his story of the day, but seemed to always have some kind of inside knowledge about the White House, as well.

"I said, 'How do you have such great sources?' and he just laughed it off," she told E&P Friday. "Now we all know how."

Farris, who has worked in San Antonio radio for more than a decade, said she came across Guckert first at GOPUSA.com, then later read his work on Talon News, his online home prior to his recent resignation. "I would call [GOPUSA] for people to use on the air and they suggested him when I asked about White House coverage," she recalled. "They called themselves a re-write service. They would take other people's work and put it up on their site." (Among the charges against Guckert was that he often simply rewrote White House press releases as news stories.)

Guckert, she said, frequently passed on what he clearly thought was insider information, during his 12 appearances on KTSA during 2003 and 2004. She first heard from him the expression "shock and awe" to refer to the massive U.S. bombing attack at the start of the Iraq war, and he fingered Mary Mapes as the producer of the so-called "Rathergate" segment on "60 Minutes" before she had seen that mentioned elsewhere.

"He very often called me and offered to be on the show to talk about his stories," she said. "I used to book him all the time. We used him on tons of White House stuff." She said she "had no idea" that Gannon was not Guckert's real name.




TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jeffgannon; liberallies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: Mo1

My nephew works for an arm of the Media Research Center. He told me that any media type (in DC or anywhere else) that says they know what is going on inside Bush's administration is lying. The one's who do, ain't talking. Period.


21 posted on 02/18/2005 1:58:03 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EllaMinnow

Isn't that something? What an allegation. The left protects the likes of Clinton, the biggest traitor we've ever had in office, and his claim that sex is private, but go after a gay guy who asked two questions of the president in two years. Sheesh.


22 posted on 02/18/2005 1:58:17 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
This lady may have been producing a conservative talk show, but she is obviously no conservative, herself. Now we all know Know what? That the man is a conservative and has conservative viewpoints? That he read the GOP talking points and often expounded on them? Wow, what a revelation?
23 posted on 02/18/2005 1:59:42 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
". . . and he fingered Mary Mapes as the producer of the so-called "Rathergate" segment on "60 Minutes" before she had seen that mentioned elsewhere. "
Yep, that was some real insider info.


24 posted on 02/18/2005 2:00:58 PM PST by KS Flyover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Just googled this up:

''The phrase "shock and awe" was coined, but apparently not trademarked, by military strategist Harlan Ullman in a 1996 publication. He used it to describe a tactic of pressuring the enemy to give up with little fighting.''


25 posted on 02/18/2005 2:03:31 PM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Who would have thought the left was so anti gay and would stalk and try to destroy the life of a gay man

The times are a changing

Chrissy Mathews must be feeling so proud of himself


26 posted on 02/18/2005 2:04:48 PM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Peach
Until a few weeks ago, I'd never even heard of them.

Neither have I

Are they a paper news or just an internet news?

28 posted on 02/18/2005 2:06:13 PM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

Gannon filed for those internet sites for a client, while working for an internet company. You left has their heads spinning over this because they are threatened with the loss of control and the loss of power. The MSM are worried that they will become as irrelevant as Willy Lomax.


29 posted on 02/18/2005 2:06:18 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Peach

The author of the piece is:

Joe Strupp (jstrupp@editorandpublisher.com) is a senior editor at E&P.


(Abysmal lack of fact checking there, Joe.)


30 posted on 02/18/2005 2:09:07 PM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eva

C'mon, let's be intellectually honest. Had this guy had the past he has with the less than moral blogs and obtained access to the WH press briefings as a liberal in the Clinton Whitehouse, thrown softball questions all this would have been the FR scandal of the quarter.


31 posted on 02/18/2005 2:11:40 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

is a liar.


32 posted on 02/18/2005 2:12:16 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Peach; EllaMinnow

Duder's zotted. I think Ella and I accidentally kilt him on another thread.

Oops

As to your comments about E*P, they have behaved less than professionally throughout this story. This "piece" is so shallow and gossipy, yet they criticize Talon News and dare to discuss what makes up a "real" news site?!

LOL


33 posted on 02/18/2005 2:12:30 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Duder; Peach
E&P is the industry pub. for almost every newspaper in the country, right, center and left."""

Don't confuse Peach with the facts. For him to suggest that "Editor & Publisher" is nothing but a blog that just started up, is as ignorant as to suggest that "Variety" -- which is for Hollywood what Editor and Publisher is for newspapers -- just sprang up yesterday.

34 posted on 02/18/2005 2:12:49 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
So, are you suggesting that every reporter in the White House briefing room be subject to an examination of their personal lives

Isn't that exactly what a security screening is supposed to do? Not necessarily uncover that he's gay, but that he has trouble with paying taxes and perhaps the prostitution angle. They shouldn't let just anyone into a White House press conference.
35 posted on 02/18/2005 2:14:13 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I'm assuming this is a blog site

There is a link to the site at the top of the FR page; they're not a blog.
36 posted on 02/18/2005 2:15:34 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
C'mon, let's be intellectually honest. """

That's a tall order for some freepers - - who can't recognize corruption when it has an R after its name. The Gannon thing stinks - - it's the kind of thing I'd have expected from Clinton's White House (and I would have castigated them for it, along with most of the folks on this board). When an alleged male prostitute gets set up in a phony White House media job - - with either the connivance of people at the White House, or through alarming security lapses -- I'm not going to close my eyes and cover my ears just because it's a Republican White House. I'm a Republican because I believe in standards - - - and if you believe in standards you can't apply one set to Democrats and another to your own party.

37 posted on 02/18/2005 2:16:31 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Isn't that exactly what a security screening is supposed to do? Not necessarily uncover that he's gay, but that he has trouble with paying taxes and perhaps the prostitution angle.

There are many levels of security screenings. The standard for a White House press day pass would only have checked public records, it would not have involved a detailed investigation. And on the tax issue, I've had IRS troubles, but it hasn't stopped me from getting a DOD clearance (twice).

38 posted on 02/18/2005 2:17:10 PM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Don't confuse Peach with the facts.

There is really no need to be such an ass.
39 posted on 02/18/2005 2:19:02 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Well they are in print ..
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/index.jsp


40 posted on 02/18/2005 2:20:04 PM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson