Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
"If it produces energy in tiny amounts, that could still be significant, because it could presumably be done on a larger scale."

Inefficient is inefficient, irrespective of the scale.

"...neutrons are not a problem except possibly up close when they are moving very fast."

What happens to an atom that absorbs one of those very fast neutrons? It becomes a radio-isotope.

--Boot Hill

18 posted on 02/18/2005 3:15:20 PM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Josuha went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Boot Hill

If I recall correctly shortly after Pons and Fleischmann's original 'cold fusion' claims either Larry Niven or Jerry Pournelle pointed out that IF 'cold fusion' really WAS fusion and could produce significant amounts of energy then because of that same effect of neutron flux you mention 'cold fusion' equipment would enable just about anyone to build a breeder reactor and any attempts at nuclear non proliferation would be mooted.

The prospect of the Al Qaidas or McVeigh's of the World producing bomb material in a bathtub is a good reason to be GLAD that the purported effect of such experiments as these is only producing so little [if any] neutron flux that it is indistinguishable from background eh ;-)?


23 posted on 02/21/2005 1:05:03 AM PST by FYREDEUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson