[dog breath]

I glanced over there, at DU, since your comment got me curious and they seem to be ignoring Korea. I looked all over and couldn't see where they were talking about it. Perhaps because it doesn't fit into their political agenda. There is lots of chatter about Syria but a strange silence on Korea. I admit that I didn't stay long on their site but you would think I could find something on it. Perhaps they are hoping that it just goes away. To look at this pig of a dictator is to become filled with anger. Their bloggers might start to sound like Republicans and start calling him part of a axis of evil. Perhaps they might even call upon the government to promote freedom and democracy around the globe. It is best if they do not give themselves over to righteous anger against the enemies of the Republic, because they need to save it to attack their own president.

[AmericanInTokyo]

If Bush directly takes on Kim Jong il, look for most of DU to come out in favor of Kim Jong il, and rationalize the excesses of the DPRK, through some twisted logic, only because by intrinsic nature they are FORCED to support anyone who opposes "Bush". (They never say "President")

[AmericanInTokyo]

FYI, Japanese news sources are now saying (7:45 a.m. local time) that KIM JONG IL has told the visiting Chinese delegation in Pyongyang that "North Korea has no intention of leaving the Six Party Talks." (Breaking)