Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Salt of the Early Earth
Astrobiology Magazine ^ | 2/6/05 | Leslie Mullen

Posted on 02/06/2005 8:17:25 PM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2005 8:17:25 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Does this mean I've been wasting money buyinmg expensive Sea salt?


2 posted on 02/06/2005 8:25:55 PM PST by bayourod (Unless we get over 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; PatrickHenry; blam; neverdem; SunkenCiv; farmfriend

BTTT


3 posted on 02/06/2005 8:32:02 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It seems to me that one of the arguments for an ocean development, at least in the line that begat animals, is not simply that we use salt, but that our bloods salinity is so close to that of ocean water...contemporary ocean water.


4 posted on 02/06/2005 8:35:19 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Scientists still have not figured out what triggered the enormous increase in the diversity of life in the Cambrian era.

Not decided, but possibly related to the development of sight.

5 posted on 02/06/2005 8:37:18 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

yes


6 posted on 02/06/2005 8:42:50 PM PST by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Interesting (but not surprising!) that sight took so long to develop.


7 posted on 02/06/2005 9:02:51 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"If the earliest life forms were halophiles, says Knauth, then perhaps we are really Martians."

Wouldn't suprise me a bit.

8 posted on 02/06/2005 9:16:33 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Mars originally had much more salt than the Earth, and when Mars lost 50 to 90 percent of its water through evaporation it became even saltier. The Panspermia theory says that life originated elsewhere and then was transferred to Earth by meteors. If the earliest life forms were halophiles, says Knauth, then perhaps we are really Martians.

Where did the life on Mars come from.

Are they trying to claim that ancient Martian bacteria developed space travel when they didn't even have little hands to build space ships with.

Or are they suggesting that Mars exploded and blew a chunk of itself off and the little bacteria survived the explosion and traveled through space and managed a controlled entry in Earths atmosphere with out burning up.

Or perhaps the little bacteria with their advanced physics were able to pilot the meteor into a controlled entry into the atmosphere of Earth.

9 posted on 02/06/2005 9:22:12 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Certified cause of Post Traumatic Redhead Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix; LibWhacker
Panspermia

I liked most of Sir Fred Hoyle's ideas.

10 posted on 02/06/2005 9:25:30 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
INTREP - We could assume life began in outer space, but that would not prove any of the theories.

We could also assume that life was formed from the dust of the earth. After all, the basic components of our bodies correspond to the basic elements of the earth: Nitrogen, Carbon, Oxygen, Hydrogen.

11 posted on 02/06/2005 9:50:28 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
Or are they suggesting that Mars exploded and blew a chunk of itself off and the little bacteria survived the explosion and traveled through space and managed a controlled entry in Earths atmosphere with out burning up.

Meteor impacts blasted Martian surface material into space and it eventually entered Earth's atmosphere and rained down on the planet. AFAIK, heat is the enemy of bacteria, not acceleration -- at least not acceleration of the magnitude experienced by such ejecta. Presumably, some of this bacteria would be shielded from the intense heat of impact and entry into the Earth's atmosphere since it would be inside Martian rocks (and these we know do occasionally survive intact). Conceivably, it wouldn't take much to seed Earth with life. What I'd like to know is just how much acceleration a bacterium can survive. 100g's? 1000g's? Has anyone ever done the experiment?

12 posted on 02/06/2005 9:51:02 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks for that link! Bookmarked.


13 posted on 02/06/2005 9:54:10 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I thought most meteors burned up in the earths atmosphere.


14 posted on 02/06/2005 9:54:15 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Certified cause of Post Traumatic Redhead Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED; blam
Yes, many of them do, particularly the smaller ones. But some do make it to the surface.

Note this "panspermia" theory is all very hypothetical. Nothing's been proven yet. Except that bacteria can be revived after spending extended periods in the rigors of space. But exactly how long, I don't think anyone knows. Check out Blam's link above. Lots of good stuff there about it.

15 posted on 02/06/2005 9:59:20 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Junior; VadeRetro; longshadow; RadioAstronomer

Is this thread pingable? I read the article, and I donno ...


16 posted on 02/07/2005 3:26:32 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

It's a science thread and it goes to the formation of life on Earth -- both of which will bring the Luddites out in droves. I'd say ping the list.


17 posted on 02/07/2005 3:46:19 AM PST by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing
A pro-evolution science list with over 230 names. See list's description at my homepage. FReepmail to be added/dropped.

18 posted on 02/07/2005 3:53:58 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

The thread might be, but the conclusion isn't.

Yes, the oceans might have had a much greater salinity 3.5 billion yrs ago. But I think large multicellular organisms have evolved much more recently, perhaps in the last 3-4 hundred million years.

And if an organism evolved in a fresh water environment became exposed to salt, it would do one thing. It would die. The dehydrating effects of salt in the diet would throw it totally out of kilter, a sort of feedback, where it started to dehydrate, drank more salty fluid to rehydrate, saline suicide.


19 posted on 02/07/2005 3:56:30 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: djf

It is also interesting that there is greater diversity of life in salt water environments than in fresh water. A part of this was the evolution of calcium based bones. Marine animals without bones depended upon the free calcium in ocean water. With the evolution of bones, fish could move into fresh water and survive because their bones would act as a calcium reservoir.


20 posted on 02/07/2005 6:14:49 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson