I spent the better part of my life thinking Lincoln was a great president. I am no longer as convinced as I once was. I am a firm believer in state's righs. I believe the federal government is here to protect the states from invasion, conduct trade policy and little else. What the federal government is today, is probably the best damnation of Lincoln there could be. With stronger states, we wouldn't be in as big a mess as we are today. Lincoln set the state for the federal supremacy.
I'm not convinced of this, but it is definately a point I ponder from time to time.
If I'm not mistaken, Lincoln did not plan for centralization of power to be permanent. He wanted to gradually restore states' rights once reconstruction was completed, and the reconstruction he supported was condemned by many in his own party as overly lenient and forgiving. The mass centralization of power in D.C. is unfortunate, but the Radical Republicans who came to power following Lincoln's death are responsible for starting that.
Incidently, the South didn't support states' rights until it was clear that the majority of the American public opposed slavery. In fact, the slave-owning territories had once attempted to have slavery Federally protected.
And the continued existance of slavery would be such a small price to pay for avoiding that. </sarcasm>
I am! As far as I am concerned, Lincoln begat Clinton.
Lincoln's rail speeches on the way to the Whitehouse were uneventful and sometimes downright awful - even the GOP wondered if they had selected the right man.
He continually avoided the question of secession and war, basically stating if tempers were calmed, this problem would blow over. He greatly underestimated the Southern politicians.
Lincoln had no pulse on the people of the Republic, disregarded Southern politicians, and made deadly mistakes at Sumter by going against his own cabinet's recommendations.
I'm with you.