I wonder if the judge is homosexual.
How can they determine that homosexuals are somehow being deprived of a right to marry. Homosexuals can marry, just not people of the same gender.
This is why we need to fix the judiciary. Some judge essentially deciding that people who engage in homosexual behavior have rights that never existed before. Does this mean that heterosexuals can marry people of the same sex too?
This might sound wierd, but suppose two brothers are single and one has a REALLY good job with excellent benefits. Why couldn't one brother (hetero) marry the other brother (hetero) and thereby provide his benefits to him?
This demonstrates just how crazy it is. There would be no legal way to argue against such a thing.
Marriage is not a right. You have to get permission to marry.
Why brother?
Why not his SISTER??
There ain't a LAW agin it; is there?????