Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Man the Hunter' theory is debunked in new book
Washington University in St. Louis ^ | February 2, 2005 | By Neil Schoenherr

Posted on 02/03/2005 2:27:13 PM PST by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2005 2:27:13 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

BUMP!


2 posted on 02/03/2005 2:31:16 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
This, of course, explains why chimpanzee mailes for murderous war parties that hunt down and kill males from rival groups in vicious rituals, right? I'm calling BS.
3 posted on 02/03/2005 2:31:26 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Ping, in case you're curious.
4 posted on 02/03/2005 2:31:35 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I Blog BooksSmile. See the dentition? Not the teeth of an organism evolved to eat vegetables and grains exclusively.

...I rest my case...
5 posted on 02/03/2005 2:33:15 PM PST by dr_pat (There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who get binary, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Unfortunately, thanks to the politicization of science in matters such as global warming, anthropology, sociology, etc., one must always look on these studies with a jaundiced eye. Is it science, or more revisionist PC crap?


6 posted on 02/03/2005 2:33:20 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_pat
Somebody around here had a tagline: "If God didn't intend for us to eat animals, why did he make them taste so good?"
7 posted on 02/03/2005 2:35:30 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Bollocks. Since when did hunting and being hunted become mutually exclusive?


8 posted on 02/03/2005 2:35:52 PM PST by Publius Scipio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

What about the mosquito, I'm fairly sure they also preyed on early man, and woman.


9 posted on 02/03/2005 2:35:59 PM PST by exnavy (lead, follow or get out of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Eagles preyed on humans?!


10 posted on 02/03/2005 2:36:28 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

***Is it science, or more revisionist PC crap?***

Revisionist PC crap!

By the way, I wonder how the professor thinks they could eat nuts if they couldn't eat meat.


11 posted on 02/03/2005 2:36:28 PM PST by kitkat (Our 1776 patriots are proud of Pres. George Walker Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Huh? Explain this then: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=tZ3Aq4oACH&isbn=1592990002&itm=6


12 posted on 02/03/2005 2:38:32 PM PST by The Loan Arranger (The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

Not only that but chimps are meat eaters; they prey upon smaller monkey species. I think it is very tenous to suppose that the nature of dental types precludes Australopithecus as hunters/meat eaters.


13 posted on 02/03/2005 2:38:37 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
When 'man' gets angry,......and is in-raged at God's commandments....and become jealous,....he builts Pyramids for relief of stress, or simply drinks beer and murders.

ooops....that is another pagan book.

Sorry

/sarcasm

14 posted on 02/03/2005 2:41:38 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
There were hyenas as big as bears, as well as saber-toothed cats and many other mega-sized carnivores, reptiles and raptors. Australopithecus afarensis didn't have tools, didn't have big teeth and was three feet tall. He was using his brain, his agility and his social skills to get away from these predators. "He wasn't hunting them," says Sussman. "He was avoiding them at all costs."

That's about as dumb as saying that house cats aren't predators because coyotes can catch and eat them. Early and pre humans weren't pulling down mammoths with their bare hands. More likely they were chucking rocks at birds and rabbits (or similar animals).

15 posted on 02/03/2005 2:41:54 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Sussman says. "We wanted evidence, not just theory..."

I like how the "scientists" can say things like that but when normal folks discuss the "theory" of evolution, that kind of phrase creates a firestorm.

16 posted on 02/03/2005 2:42:32 PM PST by UseYourHead (Beware of the Rinos - McCain, Hagel, Lugar, and Specter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spok
Ok. So man was originally a sociable, peace-loving victim and prey to larger, stronger beasts. He was also in harmony with nature and lived off the land, mainly gathering fruits and nuts. He also had a poorly developed brain, was docile and easy to manage. Sort of like the ideal citizen of the world plantation, eh?

Then he discovered conservatism, learned how to harness the land and decided to quit being a victim all the time. He also discovered some of the beasts which were preying on him were not invincible and, in some cases, were even yummy. The next thing you know, he got uppidity and wanted to govern himself and run his own live rather than being a docile, obedient sheeple.

And ever since, the self-appointed masters of Liberalism have been trying to get man to go back to his natural state of being docile prey with them in charge.

17 posted on 02/03/2005 2:42:47 PM PST by Vigilanteman (crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
I also think it's incredibly strange that he'd expect the dentition to eat meat would develop before the species actually ate meat. It's the meat eating that would develop the pressure to develop meat eating teeth. Even then, it says that their teeth were a lot like modern humans and, surprise, there are modern humans who eat raw meat both historically and even today.
18 posted on 02/03/2005 2:43:39 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
what these ding-a-lings don't say is that Australopithecus afarensis was a dead-end species...

...kind of like them!

19 posted on 02/03/2005 2:44:21 PM PST by NoClones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest

I think that may have been spoken by Homer on the Simpson's one time, or a variation of that, when Lisa became a vegetarian.


20 posted on 02/03/2005 2:44:40 PM PST by puppets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson