Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some sites show huge vote gaps[MILWAUKEE VOTE FRAUD]
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ^ | Feb. 1, 2005 | GREG J. BOROWSKI

Posted on 02/02/2005 3:53:36 AM PST by Timeout

Some sites show huge vote gaps

Record-keeping surrounding the Nov. 2 presidential election in Milwaukee is so flawed that in 17 wards there were at least 100 more votes recorded than people listed by the city as voting there.

In two wards, one on the south side and one on the north side, the gap is more than 500, with fewer than half the votes cast in each ward accounted for in the city's computer system, a Journal Sentinel review has found.

Such gaps were present at different levels in nearly all of the city wards and could hamper the investigation launched last week by federal and local authorities into possible voter fraud by giving an incomplete or inaccurate picture of who actually voted.

They also raise questions about the level of oversight of how the city records who voted in each ward - an important safeguard that, properly done, can be used to spot double voting and other problems.

And unless the gaps can be fully resolved, they leave room for critics to allege that ballot boxes were stuffed in the city, which went heavily to Democrat John Kerry over President Bush in a state with one of the closest margins in the country.

[snip]

If everything is handled perfectly, the three numbers - voters at the polls, ballots counted and voters recorded - would all match. While such a match would not rule out fraud, for now even that most basic check cannot be made by the newspaper or even the Election Commission staff.

Using election-day "incident logs," which are supposed to include this number, the newspaper found many cases where the information was missing and others where apparently no log was kept or filed with the city.

(Excerpt) Read more at jsonline.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: stealingelections; votefraud; wistolenelection
How many "do overs" is Lisa Artison allowed b/4 Barrett gives her the boot?

Ahhhh, but then the question becomes "What does she know?"

1 posted on 02/02/2005 3:53:36 AM PST by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timeout

NEWS FLASH. MILWAUKEE DEMOCRATS CORRUPT.
SUN RISES IN EAST.
Film at 11. /sarcasm

Wisconsin was stolen. Ain't no doubt.


2 posted on 02/02/2005 3:56:58 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

For any who may have missed my earlier post, take a look at this story I found in the Sentinel's archives:

Nov. 4, 2004
http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/nov04/272598.asp

On the night before the election, Mayor Barrett, some of his "friends" and family, and "members of the painters union" SPENT ALL NIGHT AT CITY HALL accessing elections computer system.

More at this thread... #11
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1330617/reply?c=11

But theres no reason to be SUSPICIOUS...the mayor assures us there was no fraud!


3 posted on 02/02/2005 4:03:14 AM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

Over here....new details


4 posted on 02/02/2005 4:05:34 AM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Hey, I missed this map of all the wards:

http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/feb05/298312.asp


5 posted on 02/02/2005 4:12:10 AM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
(oops, this should be posted here, not the duplicate article above this one)

110% voter turnout in Milwaukee? That's quite good. No Democrat voter fraud there, no sir-ee!

Voter ink is a good idea, but Republicans need only dip their pinky finger in the ink, while Democrats should have their entire face painted in it, or at least their noses. Florescent purple.

6 posted on 02/02/2005 4:21:36 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nuzcruizer

We just need to let this go until the next election. Then watch like a hawk.


7 posted on 02/02/2005 4:30:49 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

But wow, wont paperless computer voting insure that we have fraud free elections?

And the Dems dont ever really cheat, since they know how the dead would have voted and why should they be dicriminated against simply because they are dead?

The dead have rights too.


8 posted on 02/02/2005 4:31:43 AM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nuzcruizer

Inked fingers only help IF the voters exist.

It's possible there were never any bodies to go with those ballots...see the article above about the mayor's all-nighter in the elections office.


9 posted on 02/02/2005 4:32:22 AM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JFK_Lib

Did you see that Rachel Corrie is still on the voter rolls in Washington state?!

Duh! Like they didn't know she was dead?!


10 posted on 02/02/2005 4:34:05 AM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

And this is appearing in a commie rag of a paper. Amazing. Every now and then the MSM actually does their job.


11 posted on 02/02/2005 4:44:20 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

Great FReeper name!

I must say this reporter has done a great job on this story...I suspect someone's feeding him info.


12 posted on 02/02/2005 4:50:34 AM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

Thanks for the ping. I'm not surprised.


13 posted on 02/02/2005 5:06:14 AM PST by steveegg (The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
Extract of the day that proves beyond all doubt that the Democrat Party of Wisconsin endorses, encourages, and embraces fraud (from further down in the article)...
On Tuesday, Rick Graber, head of the state Republican Party, challenged his Democratic counterpart to appear at a hearing on the matter Thursday so together they can condemn "the fact that potentially thousands of voters across Wisconsin had their legally cast ballot disenfranchised by fraud and abuse."

Linda Honold, state Democratic Party chair, said she was unsure if she would attend the meeting but added that if she did go, she would do so to oppose the bill.

"If I'm there, I'm not going to be arguing what he wants me to argue," she said.

Time to file RICO charges against the DemonRATs.
14 posted on 02/02/2005 5:29:45 AM PST by steveegg (The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
Owen over at Boots and Sabers savages the latest attempt by the Journal Sentinel editorial board (run by "Boosh lied, Iraqis died" O. Ricardo Pimentel) to thwart voter ID. It's one hell of a read (Owen's comments, not O. Ricardo's).
15 posted on 02/02/2005 5:43:37 AM PST by steveegg (The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


16 posted on 02/02/2005 7:03:40 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

Thank ya very much. Oddly enough, I've never even been in the Navy. The name just came to me.


17 posted on 02/02/2005 10:37:10 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JFK_Lib
since they know how the dead would have voted and why should they be dicriminated against simply because they are dead?

In Georgia they actually passed a law that you can no longer vote if you have been dead more than 3 years.

18 posted on 02/02/2005 9:50:18 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson