[rintense]

This article is pretty accurate. The unfortunate outcome of this new sexual revolution is that women have become more objectified by sex than liberated. And you won't find one feminist to agree. Let's be honest here. The majority of guys would prefer these hook up relationships- all the sex, none of the emotional attachment. And this younger generation of women, as seen numerous times in article after article, are becoming the exact same way. Sex is just another thing you own, like buying a CD. It's just something you do without any thought to consequence.

Yes, it is the fault of radical feminism and declining moral values. But what these women don't even realize is that they've made themselves sexual objects and nothing more. If anything, the so-called sexual revolution and rise of feminism have, in fact, set this generation of women farther back than anything before.

The unfortunate outcome looks to be a generation of young people who have no clue how to relate to each other except in a sexual way. Talk about a huge evolutionary step backwards.

[gobucks]

" Yes, it is the fault of radical feminism and declining moral values."

No. It is the fault of radical masculinization of women, and worse, the effeminazation of men.

In short, you don't have to recruit men to become 'gay', if the women they are hooking up with share the exact same attitudes toward sex the men do. Homosexuality among men gets a lot of press; the erasure of heterosexuality between men and women is being deliberately suppressed.

One other thing. It is not the fault of women one bit this is all happening. It is the fault of men, 100 percent. We are readily built for conflict. But we fail to engage. Men have made room for all this nonsense.

Homosexuality, rabid feminazis .... they are the mold in a fridge that has to grow given the neglect of what manhood really means.

And what is step one of being a Man? Not being a slave to your 'equipment'. That is why the article effective states what they, the males, are labeled: "guys".

That is not an accident. They really are guys. But they are also simply chicken s**ts. Why? Because the playground, where fights were once common, are filled with the sounds of ..... quiet.

Guys don't fight anymore. They rent Fight Club, and pretend they do.

Guys don't bleed anymore. They rent 'Kill Bill' and pretend they know what blood looks like.

Guys don't cry anymore.

Guys don't grieve.

Men, on the other hand, seek God. Men protect women. Men fight.

[ichabod1]

Not everyone is equipped to play this hooking up game. To me this points out how the college environment reinforces the liberal mentality of "you're nobody unless you're gettin' you some."

I wonder how Christian teens do when they leave high school and go off to college.

[babble-on]

You guys really must read the newest Tom Wolfe novel, I Am Charlotte Simmons. It is pretty graphic, so if you are easily offended you might avoid, but it really spells out in detail how dehumanizing the sexual mores on campus have become.

[anniegetyourgun]

Not to mention what it has done to the rate of STD contraction among women.....chlamidyia, HPV, herpes, etc. - many of which can lead to infertility.

Sin looks good for a season......

[longtermmemmory]

If they REALLY wanted to complete the sexual revolution, the feminazis would say that a man's obligation to a unintended pregnancy is 1/2 the cost of an abortion.

It would maximize profits for the abortion clinics because "used" women would not have the financial option of pursuing child support contributions.

It would maximize the number of abortions.

It would establish further the purpose of sex is only for recreation not procreation.

AFter all the primary purpose of the feminazi's is to maximize the amount of abortions.

As for feminists, this would give ugly woman a better chance of recreational sex since the danger of a mercy f**k resulting in a long term entanglement would be further minimized.

Ok all absurd, but it is absudity fought with absurdity.