Are we facing the threat of fascism?

Faced with the prospect of four more years of George W. Bush, some on the left claimed that fascism was on horizon if Bush was re-elected.

“We should not gloss over the reality that the Bush team has neared some elements of fascism in its day-to-day operations - and forces inside the Bush administration would be well-positioned to move it even farther to the right after 2004,” left-wing columnist Norman Solomon warned. “We don’t want to find out how fascistic a second term of George W. Bush’s presidency could become.”

Solomon’s argument was mainly an effort convince progressives considering a vote for Ralph Nader that they had no choice but to back Democrat John Kerry. After all, the logic went, if Kerry wasn’t something that you wanted, at least he wasn’t Bush.

But was Solomon right to warn that Bush is, essentially, ushering in a fascist dictatorship?

Certainly, during his first term, George W. Bush got away with more reactionary attacks than anyone had expected. The Bush regime steamrolled democratic rights (in stealing the 2000 vote) and elementary civil liberties (with the USA PATRIOT Act), scapegoated the oppressed (proposing a constitutional ban on gay marriage), and set his sights on world domination (with wars in Afghanistan and Iraq) and the subjugation and dehumanization of the world’s people (torturing detainees at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo).

But this isn’t the proof of fascism - because all of these assaults have been carried out in one form or another by governments in the U.S. and elsewhere that are considered democratic, and often enough when the ruling party was the “liberal” alternative.

For many progressives, using the term fascism to describe life under the Bush administration is an attempt to shock people out of what is seen as “complacency” about Bush’s rule. The assumption is that because Bush won the election, masses of the U.S. population have either been duped into supporting the Bush agenda, or didn’t take the crimes of the Bush administration seriously enough to vote him out of office.

But it’s not splitting hairs to argue that there’s no merit to using the word fascism where it doesn’t apply.

For one thing, this undercuts what fascism really is. Historically, fascism is a far-right movement of the middle classes (small business people, professionals, etc.), which have been ruined by severe economic crisis. As an ideology, fascism unites these forces with an appeal to a national or racial “identity.” The aim of a fascist government is to crush workers’ movements using street violence and to do away with even limited forms of bourgeois democracy.

As appalling as the Bush administration’s attacks have been, the situation today doesn’t approach the violence of a fascist regime.

What’s more, if you define fascism to mean increased police powers and gutted civil liberties, then you have to consider the Democrats to be fascists, too. After all, Democrats and Republicans alike supported the USA PATRIOT Act - John Kerry and Edwards included.

The FBI’s vicious COINTELPRO program targeting left-wing organizations was carried out under Democrats John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, as well as Republican Richard Nixon. And Democrat Woodrow Wilson is responsible for the 1919 Palmer Raids that scapegoated socialists and immigrants.

The other problem with labeling Bush and the Republicans as fascists is that it overstates the depth of their support.

U.S. society is very polarized. Bush and the Christian Right have a hard core of supporters, but there is also very broad opposition. This is reflected in opinion polls that show less than half of the population approves of the Bush administration (48 percent, according to a survey published by ABC News and the Washington Post in December) and over half thought Bush’s war in Iraq wasn’t worth fighting (56 percent).

What was missing during the 2004 election - and is still missing from the mainstream political debate - in a way for this anti-Bush sentiment to be expressed.

We shouldn’t underestimate the impact of what the Bush administration has been able to get away with. And Bush’s Inauguration Day celebration will surely be an imposing display of police power - whether it’s reported in the media or not.

But this isn’t fascism - and progressives who claim that it is are disorienting and disarming those who want to build a movement against it.

This was certainly true during the election - when the claim that Bush was a fascist threat was used to drum up votes for John Kerry, who stood for most of the same right-wing policies as the Republicans and fumbled away every opportunity to effectively challenge Bush.

The same point applies after the election. We need a clear idea of what and who we are fighting - and what it will take to build the opposition.

Washington Times Letters to the Editor June 7, 2000 - Arlington, VA

During the past several months in the American press, the Democrats have frequently denounced the Republicans as Nazis due to their attempts to control runaway federal spending. How very ironic. I remember the Nazis.

Let me share a little about them and recall some of their exploits.

First of all, "Nazi" was gutter slang for the verb "to nationalize". The Bider-Mienhoff gang gave themselves this moniker during their early struggles. The official title of the Nazi Party was "The National Socialist Workers Party of Germany". Hitler and the Brownshirts advocated the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, national resources,manufacturing, distribution and law enforcement.

Hitler came to power by turning the working class, unemployed, and academic elite against the conservative republic. After Der Fuhrer's election ceased being a political conspiracy and was transformed into afashionablesocial phenomenon, party membership was especially popular with educators, bureaucrats, and the press.

Being a Nazi was "politically correct". They called themselves "The Children of the New Age of World Order" and looked down their noses at everyone else. As Hitler acquired more power, he referred to his critics as"The Dark Forces of Anarchy and Hatred". Anyone who questioned Nazi high-handedness in the German press was branded a "Conservative Reactionary". Joseph Goebbels, minister ofcommunications, proclaimed a "New World Order".

The Nazi reign of terror began with false news reports on the Jews, Bohemians and Gypses who were said to be arming themselves to overthrow the "New World Order" and Hitler demanded that all good people register their guns so that they wouldn't fall into the hands of "terrorists and madmen". Right-wing fanatics of the "Old Order" who protested firearms registration were arrested by the S.S. and put in jail for "fomenting hatred against the Government of the German people".

Then the Reichstag (government building) was blown up and Hitler ram-rodded an "Emergency Anti-Terrorist Act" through Parliament that gave the Gestapo extraordinary powers. The leader then declared that for the well-being of the German people, all private firearms were to be confiscated by the Gestapo and the Wermotten (federal law enforcement and military). German citizens who refused to surrender their guns when the “jack-boots" (Gestapo) came calling, were murdered in their homes. By the way, the Gestapo were the federal marshals' service of the Third Reich. The S.W.A.T. team was invented and perfected by the Gestapo to break into the homes of the enemies of the German people.

When the Policia Bewakken, or local police, refused to take away guns from townsfolk, they themselves were disarmed and dragged out into the street and shot to death by the S.A. and the S.S. Those were Nazi versions of the B.A.T.F. and the F.B.I. When several local ministers spoke out against these atrocities, they were imprisoned and never seen again.

The Gestapo began to confiscate and seize the homes, businesses, bank accounts, and personal belongings of wealthy conservative citizens who had prospered in the old Republic. Pamphleteers who urged revolt against the Nazis were shot on site by national law enforcement and the military. Gypsies and Jews were detained and sent to labor camps. Mountain roads throughout central Europe were closed to prevent the escape of fugitives into the wilderness, and to prevent the movement and concealment of partisan resistance fighters.

Public schools rewrote history and Hitler youth groups taught the children to report their parents to their teachers for anti-Nazi remarks. Such parents disappeared. Pagan animism became the state religion of the Third Reich and Christians were widely condemned as "right wing fanatics".

Millions of books were burned first and then people. Millions of them burned in huge ovens after they were first gassed to death. Unmarried women were paid large sums of money to have babies out of wedlock and then given medals for it. Evil was declared as being good, and good was condemned as being evil. World Order was coming and the German people were going to be the "peacekeepers".

Yes, indeed, I remember the Nazis and they weren't Republicans, or "right wing", or "patriots" or "militias". They were Socialist monsters.

-- Thomas Colton Ruthford

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.