[palmer]

evidence was either inadmissible or they wanted to keep it secret

So it's ok because they might have already illegally searched his house?

[cdrw]

absolutely NOT OKAY AT ALL.

My point was that even when the high court says "you need a warrant" or "that evidence isn't admissible" that will not stop the police from using the technique and there is very little in our present way of managing law enforcement that will allow us to stop them.

They will use any means at their disposal to gather evidence - they will only bring to court the stuff they think the judge would like to see.