You've missed every point so far by going on meaningless tangents and focusing on irrelevant minutia. The specific state that the defendant or you live in is totally immaterial since we are speaking on the broader, general point of searches.
Guns are illegal in many areas and there is great pressure to make them illegal in many others. The second amendment does not protect anyone since it is not currently "incorporated" by the 14th amendment.
Since gun laws can be created on the local ordinance level, a person driving through to work may pass through several different jurisdictions that all have different gun laws.
The larger point is that many Freepers don't see a problem since this will be used against druggies - a segment of the population they don't like. The problem is that this could easily be used against gun owners (currently or in the future) - a segment of the population that they do like.
So wouldn't it make more sense to fight to have guns legal in those areas rather than fight to have the right to hide them illegally?