Posted on 01/22/2005 3:01:10 PM PST by Zechariah_8_13
Gay activists in this staid Washington city are planning to create a neighborhood of gay-oriented homes, businesses and nightlife are these the same people who have been carrying signs, and parading in g-strings claiming the right to inclusion? Now what, they want to be segregated? Indeed these super-gays do not speak for the entire gay population. And they are doing immeasurable harm to the majority of gays who want to blend into society just as most heterosexuals do.
Since when is what you do in the bedroom determine what community you live in? Of course the inevitable has happened. They have not only come out of the closet in the bedroom, but they have gone into the streets. Now the streets are not big enough and they want an entire community of gays so that they can do whatever it is that they feel they have to do in public. But then this would not be the fist such community of homosexuals, Sodom and Gomorrah comes to mind.
Should there be any social differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals when it comes to dining in public? What is the point of all this? If you take the time to read “The Death of Right and Wrong” by Tammy Bruce you will find a convincing theory. In part, she believes that the super-gays are suffering from a malignant narcissism. Instead of seeking to normalize their behavior, they cannot bear to confront the fact that they are not normal. Laura Schlessinger was kicked off the air for saying that. What she meant to say is that only 10% of the population is gay, and by any definition of normal, they are not. When 90% of the population engages in heterosexual behavior, it becomes the norm. In any other abnormality, doctors and psychologists would treat it, but the super-gays have convinced the ignorant masses that are easily persuaded by people in the media like Katie Coric, who champion the gay liberation movement. When the media elites agree with a position they call the proponents “activists”, when they don’t they call them “radicals.” If wanting to create an entire community that consists of only gays is not radical then nothing is.
The press would have us believe that only evangelical Christians do not want to see a an entire neighborhood consist exclusively of gays, but it’s simply a way to try and show how unreasonable Christians can be. Is it reasonably to exclude everyone from the community because they are heterosexual? Of course the media will never suggest that, since they obviously believe that a gay neighborhood is a good thing, and long overdue. The fact is that many people are becoming sick of the networks and major newspapers telling them what they should believe. FOX news is practically the only fare and balanced programming on television. Which explains its mass appeal.
Democrats do not share a “live and let live” philosophy. Just examine what they are now doing to Bill Cosby. Since he has been speaking out against democratic black “leaders” which should read “misleaders”, they have dug up some woman who says she was drugged, unconscious, and while she was out, Mr. Cosby fondled her. Give me a break, as John Stossel would say. When he as a compliant Blackman, he was the funniest man on earth, now that he has “seen the light”, he is a pariah. It’s too obvious to even discuss.
The speed limit on Lesbian Lane is Lickity Split.
i aGRREE wITH yOU 180 pERCENT!
Sounds like apartheid to me.
What would these folks say if someone proposed to have a "married and chaste singles" zone in the city, where LGBTs or singles living together in sin would not be permitted? How would that be different from what they are proposing?
We live in a country where you can have women's colleges but not men's colleges, women's clubs but not men's clubs, gay schools but not straight schools. There is something basically unjust and discriminative about such rules. They cannot meet the tests of justice, rationality, or constitutionality in the long run.
What a great IDEA. Put them all together in a GAYTTO
A new motto for the city if they adopt this "gay" agenda would be: "The Sodom of the Inland Empire", or "HIV central of the Inland Empire".
That's because MONEY talks, and Hollyweird gives a ton of it to the Sodomite cause.
I was being sarcastic. :-) These people are just evil. Paul says this in his letter to the church at Rome at that time. He says that they are evil, and that their sexual perversions are a result of their evil. Not the other way around.
Then we should just sit back and relax and see what would happen next.
Might be an interesting experiment!
Spot On!
Agreed, but in cities where they specifically have laws against sex behavior discrimination, then the rules have to be equally applied not one rule for homos another rule for normal people.
Doesn't their plan fly in the face of diversity? Would not diversity be better served to have gays throughout the city, rather than ghettoized in their own district?
/sarcasm
Perhaps the left will adopt castro's rules and just create homosexual "ghetos".
(sarcasm off)
Sounds disturbingly like Jenny Grandholm's plan for "cool cities" in Michigan.
Ahh the picture from another anecdote happy story during the marriage amendment MSM hissy fit.
A future therapy consumer in that child.
Perhaps the homosexuals will make it not only mandatory that other homosexuals live with them (fresh meat), they will demand a piece of the AIDS funding to sustain their sex gheto...
(sarcasm off)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.