Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raid on the Iraqi Reactor
Jewish Virtual Library ^

Posted on 01/22/2005 11:37:41 AM PST by Lord Nelson

Iraq built the Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad with French assistance. When intelligence confirmed Iraq's intention of producing weapons there, the Israeli government decided to attack. However, the raid would have to occur before the reactor went “hot” so as not to endanger the surrounding community.

Every detail of the mission was planned meticulously. The target was distant: 1,100 km from Israel. Preparations included building target mockups and flying full scale dress­rehearsal missions. The aircrews were selected from the cream of the Israel Air Force's (IAF) fighter corps.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief­of­Staff, Lt. Gen. Rafael (Raful) Eitan, briefed the pilots personally. Displaying unusual emotion, he told them: “The alternative is our destruction.”

At 15:55 on June 7, the first F­15 and F­16's roared off the runway from Etzion Air Force Base in the south. After a tense but uneventful low­level navigation route, the fighters reached their target. They popped up at 17:35 and quickly identified the dome gleaming in the late afternoon sunlight.

Enemy defenses were caught by surprise and opened fire too late. In one minute and twenty seconds, the reactor lay in ruins.

The way home was quiet, bringing the mission to its successful completion. It was a perfectly orchestrated opera conducted by the IAF Commander, Maj. Gen. David Ivry. At least for the present, the atomic genie of Baghdad was put back into his bottle.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; osirak; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
This was neatly done. I assume an attack on Iran will not be so neat? Is Iran well aware of this possibility? Is Israel even concerned? Netanyahu on O'Reilly the other day seemed rather unconcerned about Iran's attempt to build a nuclear weopon.
1 posted on 01/22/2005 11:37:42 AM PST by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
Iraq built the Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad with French assistance

The Frogs again? Who woulda thunkit.

2 posted on 01/22/2005 11:42:28 AM PST by utahguy (Ya gotta kill it before you grill it: Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
Iran is involved in asymmetric warfare; lets try their strategy, knockoff Iran's leadership, destabilize the government and ferment a revolution.
3 posted on 01/22/2005 11:55:03 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
The Iranians have dispersed their program. Yet the whole point may be that Israel has adapted. They have three subs with nuclear missiles. A first strike will no longer knock out the ability to retaliate.
4 posted on 01/22/2005 11:56:18 AM PST by Marano NYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson

While the Osirak raid was difficult for the IAF, a similar raid against Iranian facilities would, I think, be almost an impossible mission simply because of the distances involved (563 miles from Tel Aviv to Baghdad, while nearly 1,000 miles to Tehran). When I hear folks say, "Let's just let the Israelis take care of business," I cringe, since the logistics involved in such a mission would be truly formidable, especially since the IAF does not have any long range bombers, such as a B-52 or B-1, and would have to overfly either Jordan or Saudi Arabi to get to Iran. No, the U.S. is currently the 800-pound gorilla in the region, and, from our air bases in western Iraq, we will likely have to deal with the Iranians rather than the Israelis. My .02 worth


5 posted on 01/22/2005 11:56:41 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

And the current reactor is built under a residential neighborhood.


6 posted on 01/22/2005 11:58:41 AM PST by null and void (Let there be dancing in the streets, drinking in the saloons and necking in the park!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson; All

I can recommend a great book if you want to read more about the 1981 air raid on Osirak. The book is called Bullseye One Reactor.

You can probably find it at your local library or you can order it off Amazon.com:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0941437078/qid=1106423364/sr=1-24/ref=sr_1_24/102-9824470-7597759?v=glance&s=books

From what little I've heard, stopping the Iranian nuclear program will not be as easy as it was in 1981. It sounds like the Iranians have spread out the research facilities across the country to make 'em harder to hit.

Though Netanyahu may have sounded unconcerned, you can bet that the Israelis are keeping a tight eye on this and when the time is right, they'll do whatever they need to do to make sure that that Iran doesn't get the bomb.


7 posted on 01/22/2005 11:58:47 AM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
"Netanyahu on O'Reilly the other day seemed rather unconcerned about Iran's attempt to build a nuclear weopon."

I saw former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Fox News Neil Cavuto. He was rather aloof to Neil , and in fact chided him about some of the questions.

Somehow I doubt patriotic politicians divulge secret information to talking heads, or others, outside the loop.

Of course I said patriotic politicians, not like those many buffoons in the United States Congress. ;)




I borrowed the tag line from Freeper marineinspector, who works on our southern border.

Pay him a visit here

8 posted on 01/22/2005 12:00:19 PM PST by G.Mason ("and I'm a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
I think they are VERY concerned, as is the US. This concern is underscored by the recent sale and transfer of over 2,000 (I think) bunker busting smart bombs to Israel. Try as I might, I can't think of any other use for them than as a means of dealing with Iran - Certainly not for use in the West Bank or Gaza.
9 posted on 01/22/2005 12:00:43 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Thanks for that. Maybe that's why Israel is hesitant to make the offer?

While the US is in the region I imagine Iran will tend to behave? But when the US leaves .... ?


10 posted on 01/22/2005 12:03:22 PM PST by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I'm sure that was on purpose, right? That is what is scary. These madmen have millions they can sacrifice to build their nuclear arsenal. Funny that we rarely hear from human rights groups about these rogue states and how they treat their people.
11 posted on 01/22/2005 12:05:03 PM PST by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
Actually, the sale took place in Oct. 2004 and the numbers of bombs are:
Bunker Buster - 500 Capable of destroying two meter thick concrete enclosures
Smart Bombs - 5,000

A link to the discussion is:

http://www.cabalofdoom.com/archives/001176.html
12 posted on 01/22/2005 12:05:43 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drt1

And another link on the sale of bombs:


http://www.iht.com/articles/539926.htm


13 posted on 01/22/2005 12:07:11 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
a similar raid against Iranian facilities would, I think, be almost an impossible mission simply because of the distances involved (563 miles from Tel Aviv to Baghdad, while nearly 1,000 miles to Tehran).

Don't I recall that the U.S. has sold the Israelis air refueling tankers and ground-penetrating bombs? Sounds like somebody was thinking ahead for just this occasion.

14 posted on 01/22/2005 12:07:24 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
Funny that we rarely hear from human rights groups about these rogue states and how they treat their people.

Yeah. Hilarious.

15 posted on 01/22/2005 12:07:42 PM PST by null and void (Let there be dancing in the streets, drinking in the saloons and necking in the park!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Does Netanyahu still hold a political post?


16 posted on 01/22/2005 12:08:13 PM PST by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
He is Finance Minister I believe.
17 posted on 01/22/2005 12:12:11 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drt1

It makes sense then that he cannot divulge too much. If he were a former politicians of course I am sure he would have no problem expressing his desires and opinions, since he would not have current information on the situation.


18 posted on 01/22/2005 12:17:14 PM PST by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
"Does Netanyahu still hold a political post?"

In November 2002 Benjamin Netanyahu was appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/netanyahu.html




Don't you just love the internet? ;)

19 posted on 01/22/2005 12:18:46 PM PST by G.Mason ("and I'm a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Yeah, that's right, but still the IAF would have to somehow get past US-supplied Saudi air defenses, and then manage to fly through extremely hostile Iranian airspace to get to the target(s). Iran is a very large country, nearly the size of Texas, and to just get in and out during an air attack would require an enormous armada of bombers, fighters, and tankers for it to be succesful. I just don't see how it can be done by the IAF, unless they were granted secret access to captured bases in western Iraq, which would be politically risky for the U.S. to allow.


20 posted on 01/22/2005 12:19:28 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson