Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2

It's interesting to me that Planned Parenthood, i.e., Murder Inc. is advertising in a HIGH SCHOOL newspaper. It seems to be going unnoticed that most High School students are legally "minor children". Therefore the school, PP et al, are offering services that aid and abet statutory rape. And it is tax-funded no less!


4 posted on 12/21/2004 2:49:35 AM PST by Warrior_Queen ("The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Warrior_Queen

Planned Parenthood is a misnomer isn't it. Funny name for a group that makes Hitler look like a saint. They advocate killing more babies in one year than Hitler killed during his years at the helm of the German government. Murder Inc. is a more fitting name. Organizations such as these tear down family values and spawn the problems that they want to blame the government for. Between PP and the ACLU they've taken discipline out of the home and force the courts to do what use to be the parents responsibility. It is criminal to bring children into this world and then basically abandon their upbringing to the whims of the courts and organizations such as PP. I use to think that movies dealing with the future always portrayed the future as bleak to the point of apocalyptic but they are probably accurate when you see organizations like PP advertising (or maybe advocating sexual promiscuity) in school newspapers. Children do not have the tools necessary to provide for children that they may have. To provide contraceptives is a farce. They're trying to say when a child is going to engage in sexual relations they're going to take the time to use prophalatics. I think not. The next thing you get is unwanted babies, abortions (who knows what kind of psychological damage it causes to the mother), and the spread of STDs (some of which are not curable). If I was a parent with children in a school that allowed this kind of advertising I would be taking the school and school district to task. As you said they are "minor children" and the actions of organizations like this and the schools that allow it are criminal. They need to be brought to task.


5 posted on 12/21/2004 3:15:09 AM PST by MadAnthony1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Warrior_Queen
Therefore the school, PP et al, are offering services that aid and abet statutory rape.

Most high school girls get knocked-up by high school boys.

Given that a large percentage of these kids are going to have sex, I don't see a problem with offering condoms and free STD/Pregnancy testing.

Perhaps the answer is to offer a realistic pro-life alternative to PP?

6 posted on 12/21/2004 3:20:21 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Warrior_Queen

snip...It seems to be going unnoticed that most High School students are legally "minor children".


Thanks to the quiet machinations of the 'sex is the road to happiness' cabal, sex between school kids is no longer illegal.
Unreported by the msm (meaning only reported in blogs, etc) are the increasing incidents of sexual molestation being perpetrated by kids against other kids (most recent I saw was the report of a boy less than 10 yrs old who sexually molested {penetrated} a 6 yr old boy in the school bathroom; parents told nothing much could be done because the boys were only doing what 'comes natural'). And because our kids have been sexualized and objectified, there are increasing incidents of teachers & other school personnel having sex with school kids. And why not? Aren't all of our cultural messages saying it's "ok if it feels good"? And aren't kids doing it anyway? And haven't we been told by the twisted Kinseyites that children are 'sexual beings from birth"? Just recently, in my local area, a high school teacher (male) was arrested for having sex with a male student Right In The Hall.


And why not?
The teacher is a male who likes sex with other males (homosexual), and aren't these kinds of people supposed to be "normal", a type of "gender and/or race" and don't they have the 'right' to seek their 'unique' type of love which they express through teir sexual practices? The ACLU, NEA, etc have been going to enormous lengths to convince us that this is so, so why should we be surprised when these people act out on the messages and 'rights' they're being given?


Look for more and more of this sort of thing to occur.



12 posted on 12/21/2004 5:29:37 AM PST by Lindykim (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson