Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: izzatzo

I see your point, and don't necessarily disagree-but I ask-what if the victim had been female?


2 posted on 12/20/2004 6:36:26 AM PST by RockinRight (Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight

"what if the victim had been female?"

That's the whole point...a man with normal sexuality didn't do this. A man who displayed symptoms of same-sex attraction disorder did it.

Normal sexuality, by definition, is not disordered.

SSAD, by definition, is disordered, and disordered people do disordered things.


6 posted on 12/20/2004 6:40:09 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

For one thing, the establishment media would take it and run with it in order to disclose the sorry state of our troops in Iraq, whereas the News Observer, Drudge, and FR are the only places you'll ever read or hear about this incident most likely. Odds are the rest of MSM will never mention this it. Just another case of selective coverage to accomodate an agenda.


11 posted on 12/20/2004 6:42:53 AM PST by izzatzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
The point is the victim was a YOUNG MALE who before he was hailed with 11 bullets was REQUIRED to have sex with this creep. You cannot equate a heterosexual relationship with a homosexual relationship. Homosexuals are NOT normal. At least a heterosexual that rapes a woman knows what gender makes sense. Homos are so deep in denial they can't figure that out. Homosexuals are emotionally disturbed on MANY levels.
38 posted on 12/20/2004 7:01:36 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

I don't think the soldier would have experienced the same type of "guilt" after having sex with a female. Unless caught, then it would be too late.


89 posted on 12/20/2004 6:15:38 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

"I see your point, and don't necessarily disagree-but I ask-what if the victim had been female?"

There wouldn't be much point in shooting a female after consensual sex, worst case would have been a small reprimand for doing the wild thing on duty. Even rape of a female wouldn't have been a life ending move, might have even been overlooked if it weren't too brutal. Nope, this is a gay thing.


180 posted on 12/22/2004 7:01:27 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

The victim was not female. Rapists of females in wars historically have not felt it necessary to kill them. Male partakers of hetero sex dont have the urge to shoot their partners. Homosexuals know they are beyond the pale just by being homosexual and murder addeded to such an act is no big deal.


195 posted on 12/22/2004 10:48:55 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson