Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects Democrats' petition in Wash. gov. race
KGW.com ^ | 12/14/04

Posted on 12/14/2004 10:20:03 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum

LYMPIA, Wash. -- The Washington Supreme Court has rejected the petition from the Democratic Party to include previously disqualified ballots in the recount.

The decision was unanimous by all eight justices who heard Monday's arguments in Olympia.

AP graphic

The decision involved about 3,000 ballots that could have changed the race for governor.

Democrats said the ballots should not have been excluded because counties use different standards for disqualifying ballots.

Republicans argued that it would be wrong to change the rules at this point.

The recount will include only ballots originally counted.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: dinorossi; election; electionfraud; electionrecount; washington; washintonrecount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Breaking News story from KGW - I am surprised! What will this do to the 561 ballots found in King County?
1 posted on 12/14/2004 10:20:03 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Sounds like they have to return them to the lost&found.


2 posted on 12/14/2004 10:22:04 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun; HairOfTheDog

Sounds like some good news.


3 posted on 12/14/2004 10:22:19 AM PST by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Does this ruling have any effect on the King County Absentee Ballots?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1301231/posts


4 posted on 12/14/2004 10:23:13 AM PST by SmithL (People who are willing to accept everything, don't believe in anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

That's what I was wondering. I think it 'should' at least keep them from being counted as well, seeming as how they wern't counted the first two times, being deemed invalid.


5 posted on 12/14/2004 10:23:48 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Excellent . . . this establishes even more precedent for denying similar (il)legal manuevers here in Ohio!


6 posted on 12/14/2004 10:24:26 AM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

here's the ruling: http://www.courts.wa.gov/newsinfo/?fa=newsinfo.order_041214

They talk about King County, but I'm not sure if it's about that specific issue.


7 posted on 12/14/2004 10:24:28 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

That's what I'm waiting to hear about.


8 posted on 12/14/2004 10:24:33 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Rossi is going to lose. He is no match for the institutional corruption in Wa. The libs (DNC) will 'find' as many votes as is necessary.


9 posted on 12/14/2004 10:24:40 AM PST by mlbford2 ("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

I'm not sure it includes the 561. Believe me, if it disqualifies those too, then the dems will take it to the federal courts. A Rossi win would be icing on the cake for the already despondent commie, pinko, anti-american scum in seattle. Hopefully the suicide rate will have a huge spike!!!


10 posted on 12/14/2004 10:24:55 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argh

It is good news... Still sorting out whether this is the last word, or if these other newly found unverified absentees will now count.


11 posted on 12/14/2004 10:25:36 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

It sounds like the Dems are running out of places to find votes for Gregoire. I'm cautiously optimistic that Rossi will prevail.


12 posted on 12/14/2004 10:28:51 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Not clear what effect it has on the 561 King county ballots -- the decision says you can't change the standard to include votes that were previously rejected, but the 561 in question were supposedly rejected erroneously, so counting them doesn't involve applying a new standard, just correcting an error in applying the old standard.


13 posted on 12/14/2004 10:29:33 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
Hey, the Washington Supreme Court has a little bit of sense. What a surprise! I think that the Dem's can still "find" 42 votes though, what a corrupted bunch.
14 posted on 12/14/2004 10:30:27 AM PST by FreedomHasACost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
WOW!

I have to say: I did not see this coming.

Although Washington's Supreme Court is a bit less loony than Oregon's.

15 posted on 12/14/2004 10:31:49 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

I was watching the newscast this morning - it was hilarious. One of the (dem, I believe) poll workers said he was going through the list of disqualified ballots, and found his name on the list, so he decided to raise a stink.

He was one of the stupid ones that didn't sign the ballot envelope. So he wants his vote to count, even though he didn't sign it. And of course, I assume he believes that ALL the other ballots that weren't signed were cast by dummies (er - democrats) just like him.

Hilarious!


16 posted on 12/14/2004 10:32:45 AM PST by mumzie (www.combatvetsagainstkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MontanaCowgirlCop

You can't change the rules in the middle of the race.


17 posted on 12/14/2004 10:32:46 AM PST by KenmcG414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant
By my reading it excludes any ballots that were not counted in the previous count and recount.

In this context, a “ballot” is a physical or electronic record of the choices of an individual voter, or the physical document on which the voter’s choices are to be recorded. RCW 29A.04.008(1)(c),(d). “‘Recount’ means the process of retabulating ballots and producing amended election returns….” RCW 29A.04.139 (emphasis added). The procedure for recounts is set forth in RCW 29A.64.041, and starts with the county canvassing board opening “the sealed containers containing the ballots to be recounted.” See RCW 29A.60.110. Thus, under Washington’s statutory scheme, ballots are to be “retabulated” only if they have been previously counted or tallied, subject to the provisions of RCW 29A.60.210.

18 posted on 12/14/2004 10:33:12 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

this thread has a link to the rulings themselves:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1301247/posts


19 posted on 12/14/2004 10:33:14 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Washington State Dems will be pounding down psychiatrist doors with cases of double Post Election Selection Syndrome!!


20 posted on 12/14/2004 10:34:31 AM PST by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson