Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

And why were they only making 450 Humvees a month?[Because it was law, that's why]
Thomas ^ | became Public Law 108-375 on 10/28/2004. | US SENATE

Posted on 12/13/2004 7:03:15 AM PST by OXENinFLA

S.2401

Department of Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005

SEC. 112. UP-ARMORED HIGH MOBILITY MULTI-PURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLES OR WHEELED VEHICLE BALLISTIC ADD-ON ARMOR PROTECTION.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armor; armoredhumvees; armorflap; congress; dod; humvee; manufacturing; napalminthemorning; religionofpeace; rummy; supplylines; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
Why were they only making 450 per month?

Because that all that THE CONGRESS WOULD ALLOW!!!

Rummy was just following the law.

Once again the press isn't doing their job!!

1 posted on 12/13/2004 7:03:15 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
Get a load of this!
PING...
2 posted on 12/13/2004 7:04:08 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

It is a shame that Rummy didn't bring this up earlier. But, you are right, our press is for entertainment purposes only.


3 posted on 12/13/2004 7:07:37 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

This won't sit well with the 'do all you can crowd'.


4 posted on 12/13/2004 7:08:53 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
"Once again the press isn't doing their job!!"

But once again a p-jammer was.

I can hear rather now......Damn!....don't these people ever sleep!.....

Good post!

5 posted on 12/13/2004 7:09:37 AM PST by 506trooper (Often, I sense a lack of common sense..and that's my two cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 506trooper
at a rate up to

That's the real sticker.

6 posted on 12/13/2004 7:10:34 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Because that all that THE CONGRESS WOULD ALLOW!!!

Who in Congress did this??

7 posted on 12/13/2004 7:10:57 AM PST by Mo1 (Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Thanks for the ping. If you consider all that is on Sec. Rumsfeld's plate, it is not surprising he couldn't recite this detail off the cuff.


8 posted on 12/13/2004 7:12:46 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

My guess would be some bean counter.


9 posted on 12/13/2004 7:12:50 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Who in Congress did this??

It takes a majority.

My guess this is part of that $87 billion that sKerry was so famously quoted on.

10 posted on 12/13/2004 7:14:38 AM PST by Mister Baredog (PLEASE be sure you have a flag up on your FReeper homepage.!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

So does anyone question whether this act could be overridden by the War Powers act?

I think so.


11 posted on 12/13/2004 7:17:11 AM PST by Area51 (Diapers and Politicians need to be changed-For the same reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Yet another pyjama-clad buffoon who hasn't the proper education or training for reporting or journalism getting the facts straight. You should be ashamed of yourself.


12 posted on 12/13/2004 7:18:06 AM PST by theDentist (Jerry Springer: NPR for White Trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; Mo1

There's going to a whole lot of Senators and Congressmen/women that are about to come down with a bad case of foot-in-mouth disease me thinks.


13 posted on 12/13/2004 7:18:30 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

Good point! Did the Democratic Party run a candidate that voted against funding the additional armor?

As a recently retired veteran I can tell you the Dems have absolutely no moral authority to criticize defense funding!


14 posted on 12/13/2004 7:19:05 AM PST by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

So the MSM will blame the GOP-controlled Congress too. Greeeeat.


15 posted on 12/13/2004 7:19:09 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Well Let's just get the sumbetch from the Congress who is their spokesman to fess up to this little gem.

Bet the congressmen are hiding under their desks just about NOW.

Long Live the Bloggers and the P-Jammer crowd.
The Internet will prevail .


16 posted on 12/13/2004 7:21:14 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
My guess this is part of that $87 billion that sKerry was so famously quoted on.

It was.

17 posted on 12/13/2004 7:21:33 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 506trooper
Do you have a list?

If so, ping please.

18 posted on 12/13/2004 7:22:36 AM PST by 506trooper (Often, I sense a lack of common sense..and that's my two cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Area51
So does anyone question whether this act could be overridden by the War Powers act?

Congress never declared it a war ... so would it still fall under that category?

19 posted on 12/13/2004 7:22:58 AM PST by Mo1 (Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

OH, no wait.... the $87B was H.R.3289

Not S 2401


20 posted on 12/13/2004 7:23:21 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson