Skip to comments.
Comedians say gag is no laughing matter( no jokes about gays and women)
Times Online ^
| 12/09/04
| Charles Bremner in Paris
Posted on 12/08/2004 6:09:23 PM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
12/08/2004 6:09:24 PM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
It won't be too much longer before Europe crawls up it's own collective rectum and dies. That is, what's left of it that didn't capitulate to radical Islam first. I picture the Frogs as being the first to roof-dive into cultural oblivion.
2
posted on
12/08/2004 6:19:22 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(Taglines? Vikings don't need no steenkin' taglines..............)
To: Pikamax
So, to les fagguets zis is like a monkey on their backs, no? To make ze joke about zere behinds doing double duty?
Zat is too damn bad! I laugh at ze silly queers! Haha!
3
posted on
12/08/2004 6:19:39 PM PST
by
derllak
To: Pikamax
I guess they will have to stick with pointing out how their country smells like BO, and that they are all cheese eating surrender monkeys.
4
posted on
12/08/2004 6:19:49 PM PST
by
Mike1973
To: Pikamax
Okay, what's the difference between a blond and a bowling ball?
5
posted on
12/08/2004 6:22:21 PM PST
by
Abcdefg
To: Pikamax
Parliament passed a law that makes it an imprisonable offence to insult homosexuals and women. But it's still OK to make jokes about Muslims?
6
posted on
12/08/2004 6:24:25 PM PST
by
Alouette
("Who is for the LORD, come with me!" -- Mattisyahu ben Yohanon, father of Judah Maccabee)
To: Pikamax
I hope Sam Kinison's ghost haunts them for that.
7
posted on
12/08/2004 6:26:28 PM PST
by
Dan from Michigan
("BZZZZZT You are fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute")
To: Pikamax
According to Les Chiennes de Garde (Guard Bitches), a feminist group, the law would act as a brake on the physical abuse of women by first outlawing verbal violence Let me get this straight.
A feminist group called 'Guard Bitches' is in favor of outlawing verbal abuse towards women?
Tell me the world hasn't gone completely insane.
8
posted on
12/08/2004 6:28:30 PM PST
by
Steel Wolf
(Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules. Mark it zero, Dude.)
To: Pikamax
Guess we'll soon be seeing the French burn people at the stake again. Or better yet, maybe they'll REALLY start recruiting and training the NEW thought police!
9
posted on
12/08/2004 6:31:27 PM PST
by
demkicker
(I'm Ra th er sick of Dan)
To: Abcdefg
o.k., I'll bite. What IS the difference between a blonde and a bowling ball?
10
posted on
12/08/2004 6:32:18 PM PST
by
Amore
(First, lYouet's kill all the lawyers!)
To: Abcdefg
I know three or four different answers, and all would be deleted by our moderator.
11
posted on
12/08/2004 6:33:27 PM PST
by
Buck W.
(How can anyone who works for a living vote democrat?)
To: Pikamax
Don't these idiots know that the backlash that all of this BS will create will set them back, not forward?
12
posted on
12/08/2004 6:35:08 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
To: Pikamax
T
he Bill also creates a high authority for combating all discriminations. If I read this right the French now have a bill to discriminate against discrimination.
13
posted on
12/08/2004 6:39:50 PM PST
by
Noachian
(A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
To: Pikamax
Pack up your troubles in your old kit bag and smile, smile, smile...while you've a lucifer to light your fag, smile boy, that's the style...
I s'pose if someone sings that song in public, it's off to the slammer for him.
14
posted on
12/08/2004 6:43:17 PM PST
by
stevem
To: Abcdefg
You could eat a bowling ball if you had to?
15
posted on
12/08/2004 6:50:19 PM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: Abcdefg
You could eat a bowling ball if you had to?
16
posted on
12/08/2004 6:50:43 PM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: Amore
This is un-effing believable! Kudos to Rowan Atkinson for speaking out against the British version of this insane law (and iirc, he's done so before in similar circumstances). It must be the case that no one has a right _not_ to be offended; offensive speech is _precisely_ the sort of speech that needs protecting. Nobody needs to protect popular speech. Otherwise, the freedom of speech is meaningless.
(And the answer is... you can only get three fingers in a bowling ball.)
17
posted on
12/08/2004 7:00:53 PM PST
by
transhumanist
(Science must trump superstition)
To: Abcdefg
Okay, what's the difference between a blond and a bowling ball?
=====
Ummm... da blond haz know e ??? ;-))
18
posted on
12/08/2004 7:17:47 PM PST
by
GeekDejure
( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
To: Pikamax
Gee....this is good practice for when the muslims take over. But then again they don't stand up for anything, except to criticize the USA.
19
posted on
12/08/2004 7:22:39 PM PST
by
marmar
(Faith is a beautiful thing.....)
To: Steel Wolf
Yes, of course... I see it now... (doing my best Peter Seller's imitation): "Ze Gaurd Beetches have a bimb-plot in zer minds.."
20
posted on
12/08/2004 7:28:49 PM PST
by
Alia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson