Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi criticizes neighbors for not keeping rebels out, US combat deaths near 1,000
Associated Press via Houston Chronicle ^ | Dec. 8, 2004, 12:32AM | By MARIAM FAM

Posted on 12/08/2004 12:59:34 AM PST by weegee

Iraqi criticizes neighbors for not keeping rebels out

Another soldier killed, bringing U.S. toll nearer 1,000

-----

BAGHDAD, IRAQ - A top Iraqi official accused the country's neighbors Tuesday of doing too little to stop foreigners from joining the brutal insurgency, while the U.S. combat death toll neared 1,000 with the killing of an American soldier in Baghdad.

In a speech to the Iraqi National Council, the deputy prime minister, Barham Saleh, said he was losing patience with Iraq's neighbors. He didn't single out any governments, but noted that Iraqi police had arrested a Syrian driving a car bomb packed with artillery shells and other explosives.

"There is evidence indicating that some groups in some neighboring countries are playing a direct role in the killing of the Iraqi people and such a thing is not acceptable to us," Saleh said.

Iraqi leaders have repeatedly called on their neighbors — particularly Syria and Iran — to guard their borders more closely against infiltration. Those countries have expressed concern that instability in Iraq poses a threat to the entire region.

U.S. soldiers, meanwhile, arrested several people described as suspected senior "transnational terrorists" in a raid Monday night on a sports complex in Baghdad, the military said Tuesday. It did not identify the suspects or say where they were from.

"This operation put a serious dent in the transnational terrorism in Baghdad," Col. Robert Abrams, commander of the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team, was quoted as saying in a military statement.

The American soldier slain Tuesday was gunned down by small-arms fire while on patrol in Baghdad. As of 10 a.m. Tuesday, the Pentagon Web site listed the number of combat deaths as 999; it was not clear if the soldier was included.

The military also announced a Marine died in a vehicle accident in western Baghdad. The two deaths brought the number of U.S. military who have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003 to 1,278, including noncombat deaths, according to an Associated Press tally.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: deathlist; iran; iraq; iraqwar; media; mediabias; proterrorist; syria; terrorism; terrorists; waronterror; waronterrorism; wot; zogbyism
So much for them being "freedom fighters". They are jihadist terrorists.
1 posted on 12/08/2004 12:59:35 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: weegee

Another soldier killed, bringing U.S. toll nearer 1,000

What is going on?This is the 2nd time tonight,that I have read an article that stated the U.S. toll is at or nearing 1000? The first was at Yahoo.


2 posted on 12/08/2004 1:24:27 AM PST by loboinok (GUN CONTROL IS HITTING WHAT YOU AIM AT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loboinok

Combat deaths. The pre-election 1,000 was "all deaths".

They've been pushing for a high number but then you knew that. The number is compiled by antiwar protestors, not the government.

Goebbel's big lie in action.


3 posted on 12/08/2004 1:28:01 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: loboinok
The American soldier slain Tuesday was gunned down by small-arms fire while on patrol in Baghdad. As of 10 a.m. Tuesday, the Pentagon Web site listed the number of combat deaths as 999; it was not clear if the soldier was included.

The military also announced a Marine died in a vehicle accident in western Baghdad. The two deaths brought the number of U.S. military who have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003 to 1,278, including noncombat deaths, according to an Associated Press tally.

I think that explains the figure.

4 posted on 12/08/2004 1:30:34 AM PST by this_ol_patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: this_ol_patriot

I'd be interested in seeing the full AP list. One of the lists I saw included the death of a woman who served in Iraq and was hit crossing a highway in Kansas while on leave. Bush's fault? Bush lied, people died? BS.


5 posted on 12/08/2004 1:54:46 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: loboinok

The media feed on each other.

Red6


6 posted on 12/08/2004 2:03:30 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: this_ol_patriot

That sounds about accurate. 1/3 our casualties are accidents of some sort. Vehicular, crushing, split rims on run flats, lots and lots of simple accidents. We have those in the US and everywhere else too. Something like 45,000 (I think that’s about right) will die from automotive accidents in the US this year. But the story is so much less impressive if the media puts it in context. We have about 1000 dead after 2 years of combat operations. While there are highs and lows in activity, over the long haul the tendency has been a DECLINE. Yet the critical CIA article consumes CNN and other media. It really is that simple, bad news sells. The media has a liberal bias and this topic is very sensational and politicized. Is a the story of the DOZENS of dead soldiers from accidents in the US/Europe/USARPAC and elsewhere just in the last year newsworthy? It's got to be sensational, and 1300 (rounded up with accidents included) sounds better than 999 over two years, tendency declining. It's macabre.



7 posted on 12/08/2004 2:20:00 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Rebels aided by sources in Syria, U.S. says (Syria behind Insurgency DRUDGE)
8 posted on 12/08/2004 2:43:18 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Barbed wire around the entire country. Why are the foreign fighters being called insurgents? WHY!? They are not "rising up" they are coming in.


9 posted on 12/08/2004 5:24:01 AM PST by infowars_victory (Under the spreading chestnut tree I sold you and you sold me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

The Ten Costliest Battles of the Civil War
Based on total casualties (killed, wounded, missing, and captured)


#1
Battle of Gettysburg
Date: July 1-3, 1863

Location: Pennsylvania
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: George G. Meade
Confederate Forces Engaged: 75,000
Union Forces Engaged: 82,289
Winner: Union
Casualties: 51,112 (23,049 Union and 28,063 Confederate)





#2
Battle of Chickamauga
Date: September 19-20, 1863

Location: Georgia
Confederate Commander: Braxton Bragg
Union Commander: William Rosecrans
Confederate Forces Engaged: 66,326
Union Forces Engaged: 58,222
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 34,624 (16,170 Union and 18,454 Confederate)





#3
Battle of Chancellorsville
Date: May 1-4, 1863

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: Joseph Hooker
Confederate Forces Engaged: 60,892
Union Forces Engaged: 133,868
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 30,099 (17,278 Union and 12,821 Confederate)





#4
Battle of Spotsylvania
Date: May 8-19, 1864

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 50,000
Union Forces Engaged: 83,000
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 27,399 (18,399 Union and 9)000 Confederate)





#5
Battle of Antietam
Date: September 17, 1862

Location: Maryland
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: George B. McClellan
Confederate Forces Engaged: 51,844
Union Forces Engaged: 75,316
Winner: Union
Casualties: 26,134 (12,410 Union and 13,724 Confederate)





#6
Battle of The Wilderness
Date: May 5-7, 1864

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 61,025
Union Forces Engaged: 101,895
Winner: Inconclusive
Casualties: 25,416 (17,666 Union and 7,750 Confederate)





#7
Battle of Second Manassas
Date: August 29-30, 1862

Location: Virginia
Confederate Commander: Robert E. Lee
Union Commander: John Pope
Confederate Forces Engaged: 48,527
Union Forces Engaged: 75,696
Winner: Confederacy
Casualties: 25,251 (16,054 Union and 9,197 Confederate)





#8
Battle of Stone's River
Date: December 31, 1862

Location: Tennessee
Confederate Commander: Braxton Bragg
Union Commander: William S. Rosecrans
Confederate Forces Engaged: 37,739
Union Forces Engaged: 41,400
Winner: Union
Casualties: 24,645 (12,906 Union and 11,739 Confederate)





#9
Battle of Shiloh
Date: April 6-7, 1862

Location: Tennessee
Confederate Commander: Albert Sidney Johnston/ P. G. T. Beauregard
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 40,335
Union Forces Engaged: 62,682
Winner: Union
Casualties: 23,741 (13,047 Union and 10,694 Confederate)





#10
Battle of Fort Donelson
Date: February 13-16, 1862

Location: Tennessee
Confederate Commander: John B. Floyd/Simon B. Buckner
Union Commander: Ulysses S. Grant
Confederate Forces Engaged: 21,000
Union Forces Engaged: 27,000
Winner: Union
Casualties: 19,455 (2,832 Union and 16,623 Confederate)




10 posted on 12/08/2004 7:17:52 AM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson