Skip to comments.
Bill proposes nearly doubling Border Patrol agents
modbee ^
| 12-7-04
Posted on 12/07/2004 3:56:25 PM PST by LouAvul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: LouAvul
Every new agent should be used to go after employers.
If we can get all social services to them cut off and there aren't any employers to hire them they will go back to where they came from and the border will close itself as far as illegal immigration is concerned and the border enforcment will return to catching smugglers.
21
posted on
12/07/2004 4:18:22 PM PST
by
dalereed
To: dalereed
Every new agent should be used to go after employers.How do you get juries to convict?
22
posted on
12/07/2004 4:19:10 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: TFine80
And allow the freaking local law enforcement to do their job... And enforce the law.
Sorry more like "force" the local law to enforce the laws - most major cities - such as Houston, not only just look the other way, but the actually set of designated waiting sites with facilities to encourage illegal day laborers to congregate for the benefit of local contractors
23
posted on
12/07/2004 4:19:11 PM PST
by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: Poohbah
And, start fining the companies that employ these criminals. I don't care if it's aunt Sue who simply has an illegal/criminal gardner/maid. Fine her, hard. We have those laws on the books. Unfortunately, juries are unwilling to convict
Juries are unable to convict when employers are never fined/arrested and the cases are never prosecuted.
25
posted on
12/07/2004 4:20:36 PM PST
by
AreaMan
To: texasborn1960
It kind of hard for a jury to convict if the cases are never brought before them.There was a concerted effort to bring those cases before juries back in 1986, and again in 1994-95.
Juries refused to convict.
26
posted on
12/07/2004 4:21:13 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
Comment #27 Removed by Moderator
To: Poohbah
With almost 80% against illegals it should be easy.
28
posted on
12/07/2004 4:22:10 PM PST
by
dalereed
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: AreaMan
Juries are unable to convict when employers are never fined/arrested and the cases are never prosecuted.There have been two major attempts to do so, in 1986 and in 1994-95. In each case, juries were handed open-and-shut cases that demonstrated mens rea (which is extremely HARD to do in these cases), and they refused to pull the trigger.
30
posted on
12/07/2004 4:22:38 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: LouAvul
We don't need no steenkin' bill. We have LAWS already which are not being ENFORCED!
This totally asinine bill simply increases government spending.
31
posted on
12/07/2004 4:23:18 PM PST
by
KiloLima
(www.opgratitude.com = Give, you will feel better.)
To: LouAvul
I think initial conflicts will start on a few ranches in the Southwest where private property owners begin to protect their land. A few shootouts should break the ice. But where or who the govt. will come down on is anyone's guess. Once a private land owner, a citizen of the U.S. decides to protect or secure his private land who is wrong and whom is right?Who gets prosecuted?
32
posted on
12/07/2004 4:23:34 PM PST
by
rodguy911
( President Reagan---all the rest.)
To: Normal4me
Sorry. The enviros won't let us finish building the fence that was already started, due to the endangerd Bell's vireo (a little ol' birdy).
33
posted on
12/07/2004 4:24:29 PM PST
by
KiloLima
(www.opgratitude.com = Give, you will feel better.)
To: dalereed
With almost 80% against illegals it should be easy.You'd think that, wouldn't you?
It hasn't worked out that way.
Even in 1994, right after Prop. 187 passed, juries in SoCal refused to convict employers.
34
posted on
12/07/2004 4:24:39 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Joe Hadenuf
Buchanan is right about alot. I've got reasons to really distrust him, but I'm not going to start that now. I'm watching this vote. This is one of those that shows us just how many "legislooters" we have that are not totally bought and paid for. Not too many!
35
posted on
12/07/2004 4:24:57 PM PST
by
AuntB
(Every person who enters the U.S. illegally--from anywhere--increases the likelihood of another 9/11)
To: LouAvul
"...and substantially increase the size of immigrant detention facilities over the next five years..."Why?
Solution: .308
36
posted on
12/07/2004 4:25:15 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: AuntB
Yes, but AuntB, don't you feel SAFER now?
37
posted on
12/07/2004 4:25:42 PM PST
by
KiloLima
(www.opgratitude.com = Give, you will feel better.)
To: LouAvul
How many of the 19 hijackers on 911 walked across the mexican border? NONE! Zero, zip nada. They all came in comfortably in commercial jet aircraft on valid student or visitor visa's.
How many of the 12 million (estimate) illegals from mexico border have been involved in terrorist acts in the United States? None yet!
38
posted on
12/07/2004 4:26:34 PM PST
by
gwbiny2k
To: Normal4me
I like my idea better, but yours is a good backup plan.
39
posted on
12/07/2004 4:26:54 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: texasborn1960
That was damn near 10 years ago, perhaps, just perhaps 9/11 and the increases in taxes people have had to pay will change things. It amazes me that people who say they are for law and order ignore the breaking of laws if it saves them 5 cents.
You've swerved--by accident--into the issue.
Hiring illegal aliens is illegal. It isn't viewed, for the most part, as a crime.
Think of Prohibition. The Volstead Act was one of the most unenforced laws in US history--despite enormous resources getting spent on enforcing it. Production and importation of spirits was illegal. The citizenry of the United States didn't view possession or sale of spirits as a crime.
40
posted on
12/07/2004 4:27:30 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson