1 posted on
12/04/2004 9:30:59 AM PST by
Loyalist
To: Loyalist
To: Loyalist
3 posted on
12/04/2004 9:32:03 AM PST by
MisterRepublican
("I must go. I must be elusive.")
To: Loyalist
Where's Court TV when you need them??
6 posted on
12/04/2004 9:33:24 AM PST by
Texican72
To: Loyalist
You've been here long enough to know the rules. Now cough them up.
7 posted on
12/04/2004 9:33:25 AM PST by
lowbridge
To: Loyalist
"Are you suggesting, your honour, that the fact that I've taken off my clothes here is evidence of some kind of mental disorder?"
8 posted on
12/04/2004 9:34:27 AM PST by
EggsAckley
(...............stop unnecessary excerpting.................)
To: Loyalist
To: xsmommy; mountaineer; lawdude; Luddite Patent Counsel
"Excuse me, your honour. Is this directly relevant?" she asked, wearing nothing but her underwear. "Are you suggesting, your honour, that the fact that I've taken off my clothes here is evidence of some kind of mental disorder?" Classic. Classic.
To: Loyalist
Is this some kind of bust?
It's very impressive, but it's not why we're here.
14 posted on
12/04/2004 9:39:58 AM PST by
hometoroost
(TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
To: Junior
Here's one way to lose your case in court quickly!
16 posted on
12/04/2004 9:41:20 AM PST by
cjshapi
To: Loyalist; traderrob6; MisterRepublican
a form of non-violent protest...It's political, it's rights-based...
Clearly, these two key phrases conjur up images of unshaven legs and arm pits, earth shoes, tie dyed hemp clothing, and the aroma of pitchouli.
I am glad there are no pictures.
Owl_Eagle
”Guns Before Butter.”
18 posted on
12/04/2004 9:42:33 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(Zell Miller- No Better Friend, No Worse Enemy.)
To: Loyalist
I am SO glad to see that the judge didn't give in and hold her in contempt of court and give her exactly what she wanted!!
I don't see whether or not she got arrested but I almost don't care as long as she didn't get her way!
crybaby.
oh...and please, we really SHOULD give this woman custoday of a child!! pleeeese! </sarcasm>
19 posted on
12/04/2004 9:42:35 AM PST by
melbell
(groovy)
To: Loyalist
The woman was in court for a hearing on guardianship of her eight-month-old daughter. Well, this should cinch it for her.
28 posted on
12/04/2004 9:55:06 AM PST by
aquila48
To: Loyalist
Court took a 10-minute break then came back into session without the woman.Some punch lines just write themselves. Anybody got a smoke?
29 posted on
12/04/2004 9:58:35 AM PST by
ZOOKER
(proudly killing threads since 1998)
To: Loyalist
Soon, it became clear that court would have to take a recess. IOW, she continued to take it all off. That's elegant writing, IMO.
30 posted on
12/04/2004 9:59:37 AM PST by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: Loyalist
This sounds like an old burlesque routine.
Lets see..Judge Andrew Napolitano or a clone of him plays the judge.
A woman named DIXIE KUPPS plays the poor distraught mother.
34 posted on
12/04/2004 10:08:03 AM PST by
Dat Mon
(clever tagline under construction)
To: Loyalist
It seems like every week someone is taking their clothes off for some stupid reason, men and woman.
37 posted on
12/04/2004 10:33:02 AM PST by
ditto h
To: Loyalist
Gotta love Winnipeg. I'm sitting here downtown looking out my balcony and wondering: where was this leftist moron indoctrinated? Berkeley? Cuba?
Nah. We have our own socialist reeducation camp right down the road, calls itself "the University of Winnipeg". No wonder this place is such a (frozen) lefty hellhole.
To: Loyalist
Well this proves that justice isn't blind.
39 posted on
12/04/2004 10:40:52 AM PST by
byteback
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
