Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Over 25% of births in 2003 were by C-section (also some other shocking statistics)
Associated Press ^ | Nov. 23, 2004, 12:22PM | no byline

Posted on 11/24/2004 1:15:31 PM PST by weegee

WASHINGTON -- More than a quarter of babies born in the United States in 2003 were delivered by Caesarean section, the highest rate on record, according to a government report released today.

Birth rates for teenagers continued their steady decline last year while increasing for women age 35 to 44, the report from the National Center for Health Statistics said. The agency is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Nearly 4.1 million births were recorded in the United States in 2003, a slight increase over 2002. Roughly 1.13 million, or 27.6 percent, were Caesarean deliveries. The rate is up by a third since 1996, said the report, which is a preliminary look at U.S. births last year.

A Caesarean section is major abdominal surgery with serious potential side effects. The report does not distinguish between those that were medically necessary and those that were elective.

The question of whether it should be performed when natural childbirth poses no threat to either mother or baby is controversial among obstetricians.

One unexplained trend in the annual report is the continued increase in the rate of premature and low birthweight babies even though the teen birth rate dropped, fewer women were smoking while pregnant, and more women were getting timely prenatal care.

The rate of babies born after less than 37 weeks of gestation rose slightly to 12.3 percent, the report said, and those weighing less than 5.5 pounds increased slightly to 7.9 percent last year.

Some of the rise in these early births can be tied to the increasing number of older mothers, who naturally and through fertility treatments are more likely to have twins and triplets. These babies are more likely to be born early and weigh less, said Joyce Martin, an epidemiologist and author of the report.

"But it's important to note that the increase in preterm and low birthweight is not restricted to older moms and for women just having singletons. So something else is going on here, too," Martin said.

Among other statistics in the report:

-- Births to unmarried mothers rose slightly.

-- Women of Hispanic origin had the highest birth rate, 96.9 per 1,000 women, compared to the overall rate of 66.1.

-- Two teenage girls younger than 15 gave birth to at least their fourth child.

-- There were 1,512 first-time mothers between the ages of 45 and 54.

------

On the Net:

2003 U.S. births report: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/04facts/birthrates.htm


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: channeling; health; johnedwards; obstetrics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/24/2004 1:15:31 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: weegee

Mister Edwards, what do you have to say about the C-Section rise?


2 posted on 11/24/2004 1:19:12 PM PST by Crazieman (Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Way to go John Edwards.


3 posted on 11/24/2004 1:19:43 PM PST by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I wonder if doctors opt for the C-section more because they are afraid of lawsuits?


4 posted on 11/24/2004 1:21:51 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Can anyone say TORT REFORM??? Until this insanity of lawsuits against docs gets put to rest, I predict the c-section rate to keep increasing. Who can blame them for covering their butts?? They have so much more control over the situation with a c-section.


5 posted on 11/24/2004 1:22:07 PM PST by StarCMC (It's God's job to forgive Bin Laden; it's our job to arrange the meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

"the teen birth rate dropped"

Does this mean les sexually active or more abortions???


6 posted on 11/24/2004 1:23:31 PM PST by glegakis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"-- Two teenage girls younger than 15 gave birth to at least their fourth child."

which means they had the first baby at 10? How is that possible?

7 posted on 11/24/2004 1:23:33 PM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

My sister-in-law just had a baby delivered by C-section because he was in breech position. I was a breech baby and jumped out feet first, but I understand they don't like to take chances these days.

Does anyone know if abortions increase the risk of needing a C-section later? I'm curious because a woman I know to have had one said she will need a C-section when she gives birth in 2 months, and I'm wondering if there's any link.


8 posted on 11/24/2004 1:26:27 PM PST by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

It was 18% in 1981 when our first was born.


9 posted on 11/24/2004 1:31:00 PM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjg

Repeated sexual abuse sanctioned by Sex Positive advocates. Statutory rape is still rape.


10 posted on 11/24/2004 1:33:39 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tabi Katz
Many children were delivered breech in the distant past, but it has been a lost art for over 20 years. Very few doctors have ever seen one except the occasional premature that "shoots out in the bed". Their was an attempt to revive the lost art in the late 80's, but even in academic centers the complication rate was about 2%. Ask a mother today if she will risk a one in fifty chance of injury to her baby or have a C-section. Risks associated with a scheduled C-section are less than one percent. Most moms today say put the risk on them, not the baby. That's just the facts.

19 years as an OB.

WW

PS- no connection between Abortions and C-section unless she had her uterus perforated during the slaughter of her first child. Probably just a symptom of her continued selfish ways. Didn't wanna be pregnant then. Don't wanna labor now. I am seeing more and more of that.
11 posted on 11/24/2004 1:36:47 PM PST by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999

Their was=There was


12 posted on 11/24/2004 1:37:52 PM PST by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Thanks to the Trial Lawyers and their allies....Dems an psuedo Republicans


13 posted on 11/24/2004 1:40:55 PM PST by joesnuffy ("The merit of our Constitution was, not that it promotes democracy, but checks it." Horatio Seymour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

That and they make significantly more money.


14 posted on 11/24/2004 1:42:54 PM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch; demlosers; NCjim; Tax-chick
It's good to know that Johnboy will be back out there, filing fraudulent medical malpractice suits and harassing doctors now that he's no longer a member of the U.S. Senate.

Don't ya think?

15 posted on 11/24/2004 1:50:36 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tjg

Many females are fertile at 12 or so.

Keep in mind that some ethnic groups develop faster and some develop slower.


16 posted on 11/24/2004 1:52:27 PM PST by demecleze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DB
"That and they make significantly more money."

Always, always, follow the money!

17 posted on 11/24/2004 1:58:02 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"Why?"

As in ANYTHING related to the "establishment medical" field, "THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL".

Is that that shockingly simple.

18 posted on 11/24/2004 2:07:15 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

See: Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births

http://www.aapsonline.org/jpands/vol8no2/rooney.pdf

"While black women comprise only about 12 percent of the U.S. female population, black women have 35.2 percent of all induced abortions. In 1987, it was reported in the New England Journal of Medicine that “black women with two previous induced abortions had a 91 percent higher risk of a subsequent preterm birth than black women with no induced abortions.” Furthermore, the study noted, “black infants remain twice as likely as white infants to die during the first year of life.”

Excerpt: http://www.washingtondispatch.com/article_10526.shtml

"At least 48 published studies have shown significantly higher risk of premature birth and low birth weight deliveries among women with a history of abortion.(1-48) One of the best, a Danish record based study (1), found the risk doubled after just one abortion. Multiple abortions increase the risk even more. A doubling of risk among an estimated one-fourth of delivering women who have a prior history of abortion would result in a 25 percent rise overall."

Excerpt:
http://www.hrtl.org/abortion_premature.htm

"Nationally, there were about 1.4 million abortions in 1992, according to the most recent report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Of those, 741,628 women had abortions in states that kept track of whether the women had had previous abortions; and about 46 percent had had at least one abortion. About 17 percent had had two or more abortions."
Excerpt:
http://www.pub.umich.edu/daily/1996/oct/10-23-96/news/news7.html


19 posted on 11/24/2004 2:12:45 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Birth rates for teenagers continued their steady decline last year while increasing for women age 35 to 44,

Here is the reason.


20 posted on 11/24/2004 2:18:49 PM PST by mlmr (Rubbing it in Leftist faces since 1994)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson