Criminal complaint in hunting killing spree.

[whodeani]

Below is the criminal complaint against Chai Vang. He admits to killing in cold blood.

http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/frontpage/pegl.pdf

[LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget]

http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/frontpage/pegl.pdf

[whodeani]

thanks!

[LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget]

Your link does not work.

[Pastnowfuturealpha]

Just listened to parts on Fox - about what he says are his reasons for killing 6 people - Seems he is playing the poor me - they called me names -

What an excuse - but normal for these days - anyone taking bets on if he gets off lightly - the press(old major media) seems to be coming to his side already - portraying the ones killed as racist -

[whodeani]

It works when I click on it. Hmmmm????

[holymoly]

Your link does not work.

Do you have Adobe Acrobat installed?

[whodeani]

Yeah it is a PDF file.

[AirForceMom]

OMG, that is horrific to read.

[whodeani]

You shoot a an unarmed person in the back who is running away saying "help Me, help me"; that is about as cold blooded as it gets.

[AirForceMom]

He claims he was shot at first, and while being shot at, stops to take his scope off BEFORE he shoots back?? What BS. And he stops to switch his jacket from orange to camo?? This guy has no defense what so ever.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Since the dead were white and the shooter was a minority, the media will automatically side with the shooter. But something ain't kosher here. This guy was hunting with no flourescent clothing and an SKS with a 20 round mag? IMHO, he wasn't hunting deer.

[murdocj]

"VANG STATED THAT VANG DID NOT SHOOT AT THESE MEN BECAUSE THEY HAD GUNS WITH THEM." -- referring to the second group that arrived on the scene.

Apparently only likes to shoot men (and women, apparently) when they're unarmed. Got the first guy with the weapon, then worked at wiping out the rest of them.

And admits it.

[murdocj]

At one point he claimed to have changed his reversible jacket from orange to camo, so he probably had orange on when it all started.

[muawiyah]

You should read the man's confession. He says he was shot at. That's the reason he shot back.

The name-calling part is just part of the color ~

More interesting is the fact that his confession coincides very well with the preliminary forensic analysis of the crime-scene. Let's see if the other witnesses do as well ~ particularly when it comes to the part about who had what guns. Lord forbid some doggone fool went out there and gathered up (or stole) rifles from the dead people.

[murdocj]

Assuming, of course, that this is really the real document.

[jurroppi1]

Yeah, the family keeps claiming he isn't a violent person while being questioned by reporters shown on the local news here in MN. However, the news team found out that in the past several months there have been 5 police calls regarding goings on at the Vang household. There were two domestic disturbance calls during one of which he threatened to kill his wife.

No, no violent tendencies there.

[mylife]

Bafreekinzarre

[murdocj]

Lord forbid some doggone fool went out there and gathered up (or stole) rifles from the dead people.

This occurred to me initially, as well. But Vang's statement doesn't indicate that there was more than one other weapon initially.

Regardless of what happened, chasing down fleeing targets and returning to the scene to shoot more people isn't going to go over well even if he was truly antagonized and shot at first and felt the need to defend himself.

[AirForceMom]

But if you were being shot at would you stop to take a scope off the rifle before shooting back?