Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
This CAN'T be. That would mean that the American Indians were not the first here in Amerigo Vespucci's namesake. Gasp!

Isn't this sacrilege? Isn't there a law against denying the firstness, sacredness and indigineous-ness of the American Indian?

The older-than-13,000-year-old-Siberian-hunter-sacred-thou-shalt-not-debate-American-Indian Euro-mammoth hunter evidence has this NASTY habit of popping up all over the country. 50,000 years ago? Wow.

CALL IN THE ARMY!
BURY THE EVIDENCE, again.
THOU SHALT NOT....oh never mind. You get my point.

9 posted on 11/19/2004 8:16:05 AM PST by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: starfish923; SunkenCiv
Actually the first were a unique tribe, sometimes called "freepers".


43 posted on 11/19/2004 6:36:13 PM PST by visualops (Freedom is worth fighting for, dying for and standing for: the advance of freedom leads to peace-GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson