Posted on 11/10/2004 3:49:36 PM PST by gnarledmaw
Contact Your Senators
-- Ask them to oppose naming anti-gun Sen. Arlen Specter as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org
Tuesday, November 9, 2004
You would have thought John Kerry had won an astounding Electoral College victory, rather than George W. Bush.
But, within 24 hours after the presidential results were in, there was the Senate Judiciary Committee heir-apparent, Pennsylvania liberal Republican Arlen Specter, warning Bush not to make conservative nominations to the U.S. Supreme court.
The “code words” used by Specter centered around abortion, but the message was clear: “No pro-gun conservatives need apply.”
Said Specter:
“That is my view, now, before, and always. ... The president is well aware of what happened, when a bunch of his [conservative, pro-gun] nominees were sent up, with the filibuster... I would expect the president to be mindful of the considerations which I am mentioning...”
Yes, this is the same Specter who GOA opposed in the Pennsylvania Senate primary earlier this year, when he was being challenged by an A-rated congressman, Pat Toomey. (GOA was the ONLY national gun lobby to support Toomey.)
This is the same Specter who has opposed your gun rights over the last several years. To be sure, this is the Specter who:
* Cosponsored legislation in 1991 to make it a FELONY to possess any magazine that holds more than 15 rounds (S. 635).
* Voted FOR the crime bill (HR 3355) which contained the Clinton semi- auto ban in 1994.
* Voted FOR the Incumbent Protection Act in 2002 to prevent groups like the NRA and GOA from criticizing public officials in the electronic media up to 60 days before an election (HR 2356).
This is also the same Specter who voted AGAINST arming the nation’s pilots in September 2002. Amazingly, he was one of only SIX senators who voted against this bill. Even anti-gun Senators John Kerry and John Edwards voted right!
Specter has shown his true anti-gun colors over his career in the U.S. Senate, and now he is next in line to be the chairman of the all- powerful Judiciary Committee which controls judicial nominations -- not to mention gun control legislation.
The last thing we need is for pro-gun Supreme Court nominees to be blocked by a Republican Chairman.
But there is good news: There is no Senate rule which guarantees Specter the chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee -- where he can block Bush’s nominees from even getting a Senate vote. The new chairman will be chosen, first, by a majority of the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and, then, by a majority of all Senate Republicans.
Thus, it is well within the rights of Senate Republicans to award the Judiciary Committee post to current-chairman Orrin Hatch, Iowa’s Chuck Grassley, Arizona’s Jon Kyl, or Alabama’s Jeff Sessions. Any of these men would presumably support Bush’s conservative pro-gun nominees, rather than opposing them.
ACTION: Contact your Republican senator(s). Ask him or her to vote against naming anti-gun Senator Arlen Specter as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Please visit the GOA Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm
and look up your Senator(s) contact information. Just plug in your zip code under “Elected Officials,” and then use the pre-written message below to call, fax or email your Senator(s).
NOTE: Because committee chairmanships are effectively decided by the majority party, only Republican Senators need to receive this letter below. Newly elected Republican Senators are not yet included in the GOA Legislative Action Center, however, you can contact them using the following information:
FL -- Mel Martinez, fax: 407-897-8595 or 305-443-3611
GA -- Johnny Isakson, email: ga06@mail.house.gov
LA -- David Vitter, fax: 202-225-0739
NC -- Richard Burr, email: richard.burrnc05@mail.house.gov
OK -- Tom Coburn, fax: 918-294-8380 or 580-353-1978
SC -- Jim DeMint, fax: 202-226-1177
SD -- John Thune, fax: 605-221-1021 or email: info@johnthune.com
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Senator:
Less than 24 hours after the presidential election, Arlen Specter was warning George Bush not to nominate pro-gun conservatives for the two to four anticipated slots expected to be available on the U.S. Supreme Court.
The last thing we need is for pro-gun Supreme Court nominees to be blocked by a Republican senator who votes like a Democrat.
Please do what you can to stop Arlen Specter from being named as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Sincerely,
There is no good reason to give specter the kind of power he wants. He will only use it to stymie our agenda and advance that of the democrats.
Heres your answer...
One would think that with all the conservative groups that Arlen has crossed, or is likely to cross, that his elevtion to the SJC chair would be a no go.
What Specter wants is a judge who will conform to his beliefs.
That's pretty clear to me!
exactly. Specter is a statist. He is supremely despicable. It is so important for the health of this Republic that judges be appointed who believe strongly in "original intent." Activist judges are a cancer on the Constitution. Specter is pond scum.
Specter is the sorriest assed traitor to the Republican party, since that jackass, Jim Jeffords, sold out to the enemy.
Lincoln Chafee is another traitor
if the Dems ever get close to a majority again you can bet Chafee will "find it in his heart to leave the party ..." blah blah blah
Bump for yet ANOTHER reason NOT to trust Specter
I think Specter is a "true believer." He really believes in disproved and discredited liberalism, and he wants the Republican Party to be a vehicle by which liberalism triumphs. People in PA must agree with Specter far more than many of us on this forum think.
What do you think of what Spectre (spelling intentional) said in yesterday's Wall Street Journal?
There might be some benefit to having a thoroughly-chastened known liberal "approving" President Bush's nominees - and he has said he would NOT block any of them.
Charles Grassley, now, is much too much of a known liberal to give HIM that post.
For me this is bigger than just Specter being exactly the kind of liberal we shouldnt have backed in the first place...
(gloating in a well earned "told you so" moment)
The fact is that Dubya has been and threatens to continue to be Constitutionally weak. While I do believe that he will for various reasons nominate morally conservative judges, I dont think he has any intention of nominating anyone strong on the Second. In the chance that a Constitutionally conservative judge is nominated, then I want as few liberals from our side as possible working to oppose that judge.
Bttt!
Where?
Do you believe him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.