1 posted on
11/09/2004 5:31:07 PM PST by
Bronc1
To: Bronc1
Repeal that and maybe while you are at it, Specter.
2 posted on
11/09/2004 5:32:43 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Bronc1
sounds like they want to open up construction jobs to the coming new wave of guest workers.
3 posted on
11/09/2004 5:34:04 PM PST by
oceanview
To: Bronc1
Perhaps the NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK ACT will be the first piece of labor-legislation Congress works on. I would encourage all to join/$upport the National Right to Work Committee (nrtwc.org).
4 posted on
11/09/2004 5:43:49 PM PST by
donozark
(UMA PEMMARAJU HAS HER EYE(S) ON ME!)
To: Bronc1
I've been waiting for this. It had its place and time, but it is outdated.
To: Bronc1
Davis-Bacon inflates the cost of federally funded construction projects by as much as 15%, discourages economic growth, and raises federal spending. In fact, Davis-Bacon Act wages cost taxpayers over $1 billion annually, in addition to the $100 million in government administrative costs per year...eventually the voting public will come to realize that the "common man" which the Dim party works so hard to represent is actually only a small contingent of union members, while the remainder of the populace pays higher costs for products and services because of favoritism and protectionism of the 'rats.....
To: Bronc1
There would be a bigger savings to the taxpayers if the ridiculous EIS regulations were relaxed. Then, I might support reducing compensation for American tradesmen.
To: Bronc1
There is no chance of repealing Davis-Bacon. There is also no chance of repealing whatever law grants a "right" to organize.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson