Skip to comments.
Bush declares 'broad victory' [“Bush has so far won no state carried by Gore... ”]
CNN ^
| November 3, 2004
| CNN's John King, Suzanne Malveaux and Kelly Wallace
Posted on 11/03/2004 12:56:49 PM PST by johnny7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: goldstategop; johnny7
CNN can't even get its math straight! What do you expect from a bunch of journalism majors?
41
posted on
11/03/2004 1:11:46 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
To: Pharlap
Bush received more votes than Ronald Reagan in 1984. And absentee ballots can boost it over 60 million. Not bad for a campaign that was four years in the planning and executed with military precision. I mean the Democrats had the wind to their backs, Bush wasn't the best candidate and the mainstream media was looking to get their man installed and they still lost. If there's anything that needs to be known about America today, its not a liberal country.
42
posted on
11/03/2004 1:12:59 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: HamiltonJay
Uh.... did you forget WV is a state? I know you fly over folks are pretty ignorant of Geography.. but you could at least get the facts right.. Bush had WV in 2000 (I had to check the map).
43
posted on
11/03/2004 1:13:41 PM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
To: Pharlap
...and he received the largest popular vote of any American president since the founding of the republic.
How meaningful is that claim, in truth? It sounds good at first hearing, but isn't Kerry's total popular vote the 2nd most ever? More a function of population increase, isn't it?
To: All
Uh.. the last wartime Commander-in-Chief to be reelected won 49 states to 1. Within two years the enemies within ran Nixon out of office. (Come on! Was Nixon the first / only president to do those "awful" things?) Be alert. The Rats' campaign for 2008 could begin as the campaign for 1976 did, the destruction of a Republican president. Be prepared. (Dry powder and all that stuff.)
45
posted on
11/03/2004 1:16:08 PM PST
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(Benedict Arnold was a hero for both sides in the same war, too!)
To: sierrahome
I firmly believe that 'Kenneth' is advising 'Dippy-Dan' on how to spin his mandatory 'retirement'.
46
posted on
11/03/2004 1:17:17 PM PST
by
johnny7
(“We are winning!” -Col. David Shoup Tarawa, 1943)
To: johnny7
New Mexico and Iowa, CNN read it and weep. 3.5 MILLION popular vote margin for Bush. Read it and weep CNN
47
posted on
11/03/2004 1:18:03 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
To: Kornev
NM was blue
Iowa was blue (dung country)
Sorry Harken......NOT
48
posted on
11/03/2004 1:19:01 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(PRAY FOR POWERS EQUAL TO THE TASKS)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Guy, the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress when they railroaded Nixon.
49
posted on
11/03/2004 1:19:30 PM PST
by
Owen
To: johnny7
Iowa, New Mexico, and don't be suprised if Wisconsin falls into the W column.
50
posted on
11/03/2004 1:20:38 PM PST
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral, 48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy)
To: johnny7
51
posted on
11/03/2004 1:21:05 PM PST
by
Mike Bates
(Just in time for your Halloween gift giving needs: THE book.)
To: goldstategop
He traded 4 for 13 electoral votes. CNN can't even get its math straight! Er, make that 4 for 12.
52
posted on
11/03/2004 1:21:16 PM PST
by
MindyW
To: Straight Vermonter
You sure about that? I thought WV was Gore in 00... oh well my bust...
Doesn't matter, Iowa and NM are going to go Bush, and Bush did better in nearly ever state this time in terms of total number and percentage of vote than he did in 2000... to try to argue no mandate is comical!
Republicans routed the dems across the country. Net gain of 4 Senate seats!
53
posted on
11/03/2004 1:21:33 PM PST
by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: sierrahome
54
posted on
11/03/2004 1:26:16 PM PST
by
kenth
(Elizabeth Edwards just sang her ass off... and man, that's some singing)
To: All
What is up with CNN and others STILL not calling IA and NM?
100 pecent is in!
55
posted on
11/03/2004 1:27:56 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: rwfromkansas
yahoo map now shows New Mexico for Bush, that's a gore pick up. Yay!!
56
posted on
11/03/2004 1:28:56 PM PST
by
cccellar
To: js1138
But in addition to the popular vote margin of four million, Bush bettered his percentage in 40 of 50 states. I thought I saw a posting earlier today that showed he only lost percentage in one state--Vermont--and stayed flat in only three others (maybe four at the most), which would mean he had improved his percentage in at least 45 of the 50 states.
To: retromaven
Now to continue the mandate into 2008!Don't forget that Hitlary is up in 2006!
58
posted on
11/03/2004 1:31:17 PM PST
by
ILBBACH
To: cccellar
The best part about NM is Bill Richardson having to eat his words. He predicted a Kerry win once all the hispanic votes were counted.
To: bastantebueno55
60
posted on
11/03/2004 1:41:02 PM PST
by
js1138
(D*mn, I Missed!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
