Skip to comments.
Bush up by 12,000+ in Iowa 50/49 with 98% in
Posted on 11/03/2004 12:22:44 AM PST by GLDNGUN
Bush up by 12,000+ in Iowa 50/49 with 98% in
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
11/03/2004 12:22:44 AM PST
by
GLDNGUN
To: GLDNGUN
ok, so why aren't they calling it?
2
posted on
11/03/2004 12:24:09 AM PST
by
cccellar
To: GLDNGUN
Way too close to call for Bush. Now if Kerry was ahead, or if the numbers matched the flawed exit polling then it could be called.
3
posted on
11/03/2004 12:24:23 AM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: GLDNGUN
Let's be careful to not call it.
Geez - I really want to go to bed now . . .
4
posted on
11/03/2004 12:24:25 AM PST
by
mykroar
("Pearl Harbor" sucked . . . .and I miss you.//Freedom costs a buck-oh-five.)
To: GLDNGUN
Conveniently, a voting machine broke, and the counters went home for the night.
5
posted on
11/03/2004 12:25:01 AM PST
by
BushMeister
("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
To: mykroar
6
posted on
11/03/2004 12:25:09 AM PST
by
shoedog
To: GLDNGUN
7
posted on
11/03/2004 12:25:14 AM PST
by
Twinkie
To: GLDNGUN
Iowa and New Mexico are sort of sidelines anyway. I was really hoping for Wisconsin. We could have avoided all this with Wisconsin.
8
posted on
11/03/2004 12:25:48 AM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: GLDNGUN
2056 of 2079 precincts - 99 percent
George W. Bush Rep 735,734 - 50 percent
John F. Kerry Dem 722,093 - 49 percent
9
posted on
11/03/2004 12:25:55 AM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
To: BushMeister
machine fixed and they are still counting
To: GLDNGUN
11
posted on
11/03/2004 12:26:36 AM PST
by
whoozit
To: Keith in Iowa
It's unbelivabe that these bastards (CNN, ABC, CBS) aren't caling Iowa and NM for Bush...I am so pissed!
12
posted on
11/03/2004 12:26:48 AM PST
by
JerseyRepub
(I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
To: GLDNGUN
Even without Ohio, Bush still wins EV with Iowa, NM and Nevada with 269 of the vote.
13
posted on
11/03/2004 12:26:51 AM PST
by
merry10
To: Keith in Iowa
14
posted on
11/03/2004 12:26:59 AM PST
by
GLDNGUN
(.)
To: GLDNGUN
Bush was going to declare victory when he got NV and NM. He's got NV. NM is already Bush
(103% of precincts in!), but the press won't call it.
To: cccellar
You know how they do things in Iowa? Well, they do them the way they want to when they want to and if you have a problem with that, well, you'll just have to have a problem with that.
16
posted on
11/03/2004 12:27:19 AM PST
by
MHT
To: PhiKapMom
I think I heard one county gave up and will start counting again in the AM.
To: PhiKapMom
I saw they were stuck on 98% forever. Let's hope they finish tonight.
18
posted on
11/03/2004 12:27:59 AM PST
by
BushMeister
("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
To: GLDNGUN
Democrats cheat.
What if we wake up in the morning and find New Mexico, Iowa, O, Nevada all suddenly for Kerry?
Bill Richardson just said they conveniently "found" thousands of votes.
Bush already won Ohio.
CALL NEW MEXICO NOW AND GET BUSH OUT THERE TONIGHT TO DECLARE VICTORY!
19
posted on
11/03/2004 12:28:08 AM PST
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(John Kerry is a GirlyManchurian Candidate.)
To: merry10
How do you get those numbers? Adding those 3 states doesnt come out to 269.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson