Replies

1 posted on 10/30/2004 11:03:23 PM PDT by HereComesTheGOP

To: HereComesTheGOP

Really? The name of the place is Al Qaqaa?

3 posted on 10/30/2004 11:06:09 PM PDT by Texas Eagle ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of what he was never reasoned into." Jonathan Swift)

To: HereComesTheGOP

Knock me over with a feather. Anyone here surprised by this? RNC should demand apology from half-witted treasonous senator for attempting to slander the man holding the highest office in the nation.

4 posted on 10/30/2004 11:08:00 PM PDT by stopillegalimmigration

To: HereComesTheGOP

9 posted on 10/30/2004 11:17:52 PM PDT by cgk (I'll keep posting it until you READ IT. Pay attention!)

To: HereComesTheGOP

different place, different folks, different weapons. Not related to Al QaQaa.

That being said, you can't prove this case to the seethers. You could declassify satellite photos taken before the invasion began showing trucks parked at the Al QaQaa munitions dump and they'd still remain unconvinced.... come to think of it, that's exactly what happened.

10 posted on 10/30/2004 11:19:08 PM PDT by jz638

To: HereComesTheGOP

"At the time, there was an official underground fedayeen war effort that was well functioning."

Fast forward to today. Our enemy!

11 posted on 10/30/2004 11:35:44 PM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)

To: HereComesTheGOP

Fedayeen sitting on three ammunition crates

Fedayeen transporting crate of missiles, bunker entrances similar to Al-Qaqaa

Crates, likely ammunition and missiles, stacked outside a storage bunker

13 posted on 10/31/2004 1:58:05 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (Kerry plans to graft post-Vietnam policy on Iraq: Kill Allawi and let the Syrian Baathists take over)

To: HereComesTheGOP

So, the fedayeen "looted" weapons and ammunition but not WMD because "as everyone knows" "Bush lied" and "there were no WMD in Iraq". /Lurch

14 posted on 10/31/2004 2:30:14 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)

To: HereComesTheGOP

There was a news ticker story last night on Fox that said another site was overrun by looters and that there were IAEA(or some other group) sealed stores of chemical weapons.

What ?!! Bunkers full of chemical weapons in Iraq. Oh wait they said they were "old" weapons. I'm sorry but what does the term weapons stockpiles mean ? It means old weapons in stockpiles. Are they still not just as deadly. I don't remember Bush saying the threat is new WMDs not old ones. How much of this stuff was there and why didnt the IAEA take it away rather than sealing it ?

The more I hear the more I realize how little truth there has been to the whole WMD story. Unless we have a picture of a working nuclear reactor with Saddam at the controls it won't be enough for the media to run with. What we have found so far may be old and not much but how many people would have been killed if a terrorist brought it into a shopping mall somewhere ? Doesn't the existence of some weapons prove that there were probably more ? I guess if we don't find the exact amounts claimed where we said they would be it will never be newsworthy.

17 posted on 10/31/2004 8:53:24 AM PST by Bigjimslade

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794