Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big G.O.P. Bid to Challenge Voters at Polls in Key State
The New York Times ^ | 10/23/04 | MICHAEL MOSS

Posted on 10/22/2004 7:38:53 PM PDT by Pokey78

Republican Party officials in Ohio took formal steps yesterday to place thousands of recruits inside polling places on Election Day to challenge the qualifications of voters who they suspect may not be eligible to cast ballots.

Party officials say their effort is necessary to guard against potential fraud arising from aggressive moves by the Democrats to register tens of thousands of new voters in Ohio, seen as one of the most pivotal battlegrounds in the Nov. 2 elections.

Advertisement

Election officials in other swings states, from Arizona to Wisconsin and Florida, say they are bracing for similar efforts by Republicans to challenge new voters at polling places, reflecting months of disputes over voting procedures and the anticipation of an election as close as the one in 2000.

Ohio election officials said they had never seen so large a drive to prepare for Election Day challenges. They said they were scrambling yesterday to be ready for disruptions in the voting process as well as alarm and complaints among voters. Some officials said they worried that the challenges could discourage or even frighten others waiting to vote.

Ohio Democrats were struggling to match the Republicans' move, which had been rumored for weeks. Both parties had until 4 p.m. to register people they had recruited to monitor the election. Republicans said they had enlisted 3,600 by the deadline, many in heavily Democratic urban neighborhoods of Cleveland, Dayton and other cities. Each recruit was to be paid $100.

The Democrats, who tend to benefit more than Republicans from large turnouts, said they had registered more than 2,000 recruits to try to protect legitimate voters rather than weed out ineligible ones.

Republican officials said they had no intention of disrupting voting. But they said they were concerned about the possibility of fraud involving thousands of newly registered Democrats.

"The organized left's efforts to, quote unquote, register voters - I call them ringers - have created these problems," said James P. Trakas, the Republican chairman in Cuyahoga County.

Both parties have waged huge campaigns in the battleground states to register millions of new voters, and the developments in Ohio provided an early glimpse of how those efforts may play out on Election Day.

Ohio election officials said that by state law, the parties' challengers would have to show "reasonable" justification for doubting the qualifications of a voter before asking a poll worker to question that person. And, the officials said, challenges could be made on four main grounds: whether the voter is a citizen, is at least 18, is a resident of the county and has lived in Ohio for the previous 30 days.

Elections officials in Ohio said they hoped the criteria would minimize the potential for disruption. But Democrats worry that the challenges will inevitably delay the process and frustrate the voters.

"Our concern is Republicans will be challenging in large numbers for the purpose of slowing down voting, because challenging takes a long time,'' said David Sullivan, the voter protection coordinator for the national Democratic Party in Ohio. "And creating long lines causes our people to leave without voting.''

The Republican challenges in Ohio have already begun. Yesterday, party officials submitted a list of about 35,000 registered Ohio voters whose mailing addresses, the Republicans said, were questionable. After registering, they said, each of the voters was mailed a notice, and in each case the notice was returned to election officials as undeliverable.

In Cuyahoga County alone, which includes the heavily Democratic neighborhoods of Cleveland, the Republican Party submitted more than 14,000 names of voters for county election officials to scrutinize for possible irregularities. The party said it had registered more than 1,400 people to challenge voters in that county.

Among the central battleground states, only Ohio, Florida and Missouri require the parties to register poll watchers before Election Day; elsewhere, party observers can register on the day itself. In several states officials have alerted poll workers to expect a heightened interest by the parties in challenging voters. In some cases, poll workers, many of them elderly, have been given special training to deal with any abusive challenging.

Mr. Trakas, the Republican chairman in Cuyahoga, said the recruits would be equipped with lists of voters who the party suspects are not county residents or otherwise qualified to vote.

The recruits will be trained next week, said Mr. Trakas, who added that he had not decided whether to open the training sessions to the public or reporters. Among other things, he said, the recruits will be taught how to challenge mentally disabled voters who are assisted by anyone other than their legal guardians. In previous elections, he said, bus drivers who had taken group-home residents to polling places often helped them vote.

Reno Oradini, the Cuyahoga County election board attorney, said a challenge would in effect create impromptu courts at polling places as workers huddled to resolve a dispute and cause delays in voting. He said he was working with local election officials to find ways of preventing disruptions that could drive away impatient voters and reduce turnout.

State law varies widely on voter challenges. In Colorado, challenged voters can sign an oath that they are indeed qualified to vote; voters found to have lied could be prosecuted, but their votes would still be counted. In Wisconsin, it is the challenger who must sign an oath stating the grounds for a challenge.

"You need personal knowledge," said Kevin J. Kennedy, executive director of the Wisconsin State Elections Board. "You can't say they don't look American or don't speak English."

National election officials said yesterday that Election Day challenging had been done only sporadically by the parties over the years, mainly in highly contested races. In the bitterly contested 2000 presidential election, they said, challenges occurred mainly after Election Day.

The preparations for widespread challenging this year have alarmed some election officials.

"This creates chaos and confusion in the polling site," said R. Doug Lewis, executive director of the Election Center, an international association of election officials. But, he said, "most courts say it's permissible by state law and therefore can't be denied."

In Ohio, Republicans sought to play down any concern that their challenging would be disruptive.

"I suspect there will be challenges," said Robert T. Bennett, chairman of the Ohio Republican Party. "But by and large, people will move through quickly. We want to make sure every eligible voter votes." He added, "99.9 percent will fly right by."

Challengers on both sides said they were uncertain about what to expect. Georgiana Nye, 56, a Dayton real estate broker who was registered by the Republicans as a challenger, said she wanted to help prevent fraud and would accept the $100 for the 13 hours of work and training.

For the Democrats in Dayton, Ronald Magoteaux, 57, a mechanical engineer, said he agreed to be a poll watcher out of concern for new voters. "I think it's sick that these Republicans are up to dirty tricks at the polls," Mr. Magoteaux said. "I believe thousands of votes were lost in 2000, and I want to make sure that doesn't happen in Ohio."

Democrats said they were racing to match the Republicans, precinct by precinct. In some cities, like Dayton, they registered more challengers than the Republicans, election officials said. But in Cuyahoga County, where the Republicans said they had registered 1,436 people to challenge voters, or one in every precinct, Democrats said they had signed up only about 300.

The parties are also preparing to battle over voter qualifications in Florida, where they had until last Tuesday to register challengers. In Fort Myers, Republicans named 100 watchers for the county's 171 precincts, up from 60 in 2000. But Democrats registered 300 watchers in the county, a sixfold increase.

Christine Anderson, a spokeswoman for Senator John Kerry's presidential campaign, said thousands of Democratic lawyers would be posted inside the polling places. "Our goal is not to challenge," Ms. Anderson said. "They're there to observe and make sure that people who come up to vote get to vote, and get it counted." Republican campaign officials in Florida did not return calls seeking comment.

James Dao contributed reporting from Ohio for this article, and Ford Fessenden and Anthony Smith from New York.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2004 7:38:53 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I am a minority voter who is disenfranchised when RATS cheat.


2 posted on 10/22/2004 7:41:54 PM PDT by Kuksool (Get Your Souls To The Polls In November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

They way this piece is written, it makes the GOP look like they are doing something insidious.
When, in fact, they are just overseeing a just election.

Voters who are properly registered and are legitimate will not be disenfranchised by this measure. This should be encouraged by the NYT as a positive, civic-minded step.


3 posted on 10/22/2004 7:42:44 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

We are fighting back----great!


4 posted on 10/22/2004 7:43:07 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Some officials said they worried that the challenges could discourage or even frighten others waiting to vote.

Why? What is to be afraid of, unless you are a felon, cheat, or illegal alien.


5 posted on 10/22/2004 7:45:16 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

My business partner just told me today he is taking off election day to sit at the polls in North Minneapolis, fraud central for Minnesota.


6 posted on 10/22/2004 7:45:59 PM PDT by keyesguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
....it makes the GOP look like they are doing something insidious.

When I saw it was from NY Times, I didn't bother reading it.
Old media is SO predictable.

7 posted on 10/22/2004 7:46:54 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

Yes, but now Kerry can wave the headline in the "community" and scream that the Republicans are trying to disenfranchise.


8 posted on 10/22/2004 7:48:13 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Yes, but now Kerry can wave the headline in the "community" and scream that the Republicans are trying to disenfranchise

Well, it's not like they weren't going to do that anyway.

9 posted on 10/22/2004 7:50:59 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I know someone who sat at a GOP meeting to work the final 72-hours...they said keep a look at as Moveon is planning to get people to wait on line all day in swing states to do nothing more than slow up the line and deter people from voting!


10 posted on 10/22/2004 7:52:20 PM PDT by God luvs America (Support Our Troops....Don't vote for Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro; ambrose

They already are.


11 posted on 10/22/2004 7:53:32 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; operation clinton cleanup
It certainly appears that the GOP is not about to allow Kerry and his thugs to steal Ohio.

Ohio GOP Pre-Challenges 35,000 Voters

12 posted on 10/22/2004 7:59:58 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

That is really disgusting. It's like democrats don't care whose freedoms they trample as long as they get their way. I just pray that their evil schemes that are planned in secret will be exposed for all to see.


13 posted on 10/22/2004 8:07:10 PM PDT by Laffalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Yesterday, party officials submitted a list of about 35,000 registered Ohio voters whose mailing addresses, the Republicans said, were questionable. After registering, they said, each of the voters was mailed a notice, and in each case the notice was returned to election officials as undeliverable.

Elvis:

Return to sender.
Address unknown!
No such number,
No such zone!

14 posted on 10/22/2004 8:11:30 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
This is great!!! Who cares what the media think. The Republicans have put the Democrats on notice that they will not steal Ohio.

There really is very little excuse for an ineligible voter to show up at the polls. Registrations close 30 days befroe the election and that is plenty of time for the registrar to process even a large number of registrations and get people on the rolls and send out voter cards. I registered in Bucks County, PA two days before the deadline and got my voter card more than a week ago. Very few people move after the registration deadline.

I really hope there are not 35,000 ineligible voters showing up at the polls in Ohio. I am hoping that this was just some olverzealous ACORN people who were paid for each registration and so they turned in thousands of bogus names to get the money.

15 posted on 10/22/2004 8:14:48 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Proud Reagan Alumna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

New York Times??? Gotta be true then. \sarcasm


16 posted on 10/22/2004 8:17:45 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Well isn't that stupid, you think Kerry voters will stand in a long line too?


17 posted on 10/22/2004 8:17:52 PM PDT by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
" really hope there are not 35,000 ineligible voters showing up at the polls in Ohio."

You and me both, because you could take it to the bank that 34,999 of them would be democRATs. The other one would be an honest mistake.

18 posted on 10/22/2004 8:18:12 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I read the piece carefully and my conclusion is that it was written carefully. I don't think it is wildly biased.


19 posted on 10/22/2004 8:21:16 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I'm sure they filed a story about all the plans the DNC has, right?

Right?


20 posted on 10/22/2004 8:22:17 PM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson