Sorry for the short vanity, but the angle of attack needed only a few words, but did need attention.
The Clinton administration obtained a federal indictment against Saddam in the late 90's; the indictment mentioned Saddam's relationship with Al Qaeda.
Both the 9/11 Commission and Senate Intelligence Reports mentioned that Saddam was a state sponsor of Islamic terrorists for years, including Al Qaeda.
An Iraqi national attended at least one 9/11 planning meeting. Sounds to me like Iraq is the central front in the war on terror.
Maybe it would help Kerry if he'd actually attend an Intelligence Committee meeting or read the reports.
Kerry will pull out by August!
Remember when we were just FReepers as opposed to "bloggers"? The MSM doesn't get it and now they try to define us. I hate bloggers. We don't blog. We FReep.
Giving Kerry's meglomania his disdain for the America of our founders and his fondness for Marxist dogma he could very well define terrorists as any and all of those who are against John F Kerry
Kerry toked too much weed in 'Nam. He's off his rocker. His wife is doing too many benies and booze too. Recipe for disaster for the White House; and the Republic of the United States of America. If he is sworn in on January 20, 2005, there should be impeachment proceedings for Treason for his actions in the 1970s. Everyone out here should get the Stolen Honor DVD and give it to your lefty liberal acquaintences and "undecideds" dopey acquaintences. I bought five and gave them to known lefties at Church. Karen came home from choir practice and said that we had scored "big time" with the sheeple. They are distributing the DVDs to their other liberal friends. So, for $100, we think we may have converted about 100 lefties to think about Kerry as unfit for command. Better investment than send a check for $100 to the RNC. They're pretty useless in conveying a message to voters. IMOHO
"The President's misjudgment, miscalculation and mismanagement of the war in Iraq all make the war on terror harder to win," Senator Kerry said. "Iraq is now what it was not before the war – a haven for terrorists."
http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,10876773,00.html
Mr Kerry said: "America is fighting, and must win, two wars: the war in Iraq. And the war on terror. President Bush likes to confuse the two. "He claims Iraq is the centrepiece of the war on terror. In fact, Iraq was a profound diversion from that war and the battle against the enemy."21 October 2004 Independent
Can anyone explain how Iraq can be a "haven for terrorist" and at the same time a diversion from the war on terrorist? Somehow the nuances escape me.
Two sides of his mouth = two wars
Two views on everything.
terrorists flock to iraq to fight the great satan...
Now when I see the bumper sticker that says "Vote for Kerry....Paid for by Osama Bin Laden", I'll know it's closer to the truth than even HE wants to admit!
And in the same speech, after he said Iraq was seperate from the war on terror, he added that we will prevail there. Like an after-thought.