[KayEyeDoubleDee]

For example, in the 2000 election, the supervisor of elections office for Miami-Dade received two lists—one in June 1999 and another in January 2000—from which his office identified persons to be removed from the voter rolls. Of the 5,762 persons on the June 1999 list, 327 successfully appealed and, therefore, remained on the voter rolls (see table 1-4). Another 485 names were later identified as persons who either had their rights restored or who should not have been on the list.

Thanks for the reference. This would seem to indicate that in Miami-Dade county alone, there were 485 people who were incorrectly purged from the roles, did not appeal, and could not have voted had they chosen to. Of course, that is only an interpretation of the statement.

[FreeKeys]

Another 485 names were later identified as persons who either had their rights restored or who should not have been on the list.

This would seem to indicate that in Miami-Dade county alone, there were 485 people who were incorrectly purged from the roles, did not appeal, and could not have voted had they chosen to. Of course, that is only an interpretation of the statement.

Right. OR it could be that 484 people had their rights restored and 1 who did not. It's probably somewhere in between. At least there's a procedure in place to notify whoever's on the list.